Recap & Digital Mapping

To recap, I retired last September from the Army and I am in the transition to my next career as an applied historian. I’ve worked at history part-time during my previous career but I need some serious upskilling. As part of my modernizing, I’ve taken an automated cartography course to make maps, and a military geography course to aid in structuring my book on the Civil war.

Now, I am in a Digital History course at George Mason University (GMU) this summer, to get and become familiar with the tools of digital history: the use of the internet, databases, and software as applied to history. The class is taught by a Ph.D. candidate and digital historian, Stephanie Seal Walters (see her Blog at https://stephanieanneseal.com/ ) which is also why there is this blog.

In a GMU summer session, they compress a semester into 5 weeks. There are two 4 and a half hour classes per week plus all the reading, research, and writing. Sounds tedious. It has been everything but that! Professor Walters has a gift for teaching. Anyone who can not only keep students engaged for 4 and a half hours in the summer but also has them wondering where the time went when class is over has a special gift. This observation is not just mine; I’ve heard from others in the class.

Three weeks in she has had us set up our own history blogs. Set up and use a class collaboration site. Let us leverage her Omeka site where we designed and implemented our own Little Odd History exhibits (I did an exhibit on the 1910 Burke Murder Trial in California). We’ve transcribed early American War department papers from a site that uses crowdsourced transcribers to make progress. (http://wardepartmentpapers.org/s/home/page/home ) Used optical character recognition (OCR) on a newspaper from the 18th century. Toured the GMU Special Collections and Research Center and observed archivists at work and discussed digitization methods and issues. (https://scrc.gmu.edu/ ) We are now on our way to putting together an online Story map. I’m going to show a journey from Germantown, Maryland to Louisville, Kentucky described in an 1836 letter my family found. We’ll end in two weeks with a review of using podcasts as digital tools of the historian.

On the letter for the StoryMap, it’s not totally clear from the letter when Edward left the Clopper farm or when he arrived at Louisville. But from the internal evidence in the letter, it appears he had just arrived, had traveled in pleasant weather to be outside, so I assume that the trip was in April 1836. Edward had been in Louisville for at least a week working. So, it’s probable he got his job Monday following the Thursday he arrived. He had a Stockton and Stokes ticket to Wheeling which would work for an overland mail stage. How he journeyed from Wheeling to Louisville is not stated in the letter, but because he uses the word passage, I assume it was by riverboat. Also, the speed of the journey supports a river travel argument. 

In 1836, Edward Hurley (1812-?) was a young man from a Philadelphia family. Little is known about him except that he was born in Philadelphia in 1812 to Thomas Hurley (1758-1817) and Mary Rogers (1768-?). One of his sisters married Chief Justice Roger Brooke Taney’s brother Augustus Taney (1787-1823). Edward lived with his older sister Catherine Hurley Taney (1795-1854) for a time after her husband Augustus Taney’s death. They were both guests on the Clopper farm next to her farm near Germantown, Maryland.

A letter from Edward to his sister Catherine was found recently in the papers of one of Catherine Hurly Taney’s descendants. I transcribed the letter and have permission to use it. The letter describes Edward’s journey from the Clopper Farm to Louisville, Kentucky in April 1836 and his initial activities in Louisville. For an online StoryMap, I propose to map his 1836 journey and highlight some of the locations that he went through along the way.

The letter mentions the Clopper Farm, Maryland, Middlebrook Post Office, Maryland, Hagerstown, Maryland, Wheeling, Virginia, Cincinnati, Ohio, and Louisville, Kentucky.  I would add the river towns of Marietta, Ohio and Vevay, Indiana.

The narrative for each location of the Story map will describe some aspects of the place in 1836, or as close to 1836 as can be found. Travel is from a slave state through free states and to a slave state, which will be touched on in the narrative.

Probable Timeline

8 April 1836, Friday Left Clopper Farm by horse and went to Middlebrook. From Middlebrook,  went to Frederick, and Hagerstown, and on to Wheeling by stage.

9 April 1836, Saturday Arrived in Wheeling

10 April 1836, Sunday Left Wheeling for Louisville by riverboat.

11-13 Aril 1836, Monday-Wednesday, somewhere within these dates, Edward stopped and visited friends in Cincinnati for 6 hours.

14 April 1836, Thursday Arrived in Louisville.

15 April 1836, Friday Catherine Taney wrote and posted a letter to Edward.

17 April 1836, Monday Got a job with Morton and Smith.

23 April 1836, Saturday Received a letter from his sister which took 8 days to reach him and Edward wrote the letter we have and finished by midnight.

And that’s it for the StoryMap portion of this blog post.

Although this post is probably too long, these blog posts of mine have been both assignments and a mechanism Professor Walters uses to get us to think about what we’ve been reading and doing and to get used to sharing it near real-time with the world.

This week as we approach mapping, we’ve read Sarah Bond on using digital mapping to understand the history of racism. Bond notes that although the topic has been covered before with manual maps and analysis, digital mapping helps bring together disparate and scattered archives and make them accessible to a larger public than ever before. Both points make sense. However, the example of the Placing Segregation project and the map illustration provided demonstrate the pitfalls in providing visuals without an explanatory context can democratize misunderstanding and misconception as much as educate. The illustration Bond shows is a map of Washington, DC in 1860 and the implication is that segregation of the races is shown. The visual actually shows a large degree of integration which was the case under slavery. In 1860, most slaves were still on farms and plantations not in the city. The black migration to cities is a phenomenon of the labor dislocations associated with the World Wars of the 20th century. The blacks in Washington, DC in 1860 were either a small number of free blacks who were usually integrated with the community, albeit its poorer parts as the map shows, or were house slaves who were residents with their white owners. The point is that racial segregation in cities was much less in 1860 than it became later, and that point is not only missed but the opposite is implied. Leaving the larger readership with a false impression of the history of segregation in the United States. Like many things the utility of technology like digital mapping is a function of how it is applied.

Digital mapping as an interactive computational model used for scholarly inquiry of ancient Roman transportation networks and the cost of transportation given seasonal impacts is the subject of the article on ORBIS by Elijah Meeks and Karl Grossner. ORBIS is a web application that models the transportation network of the ancient Roman world and gives a scholar the ability to query the model and determine the cost of goods flows from any point to another point in the network. The model can be seen holistically or from a particular point of origin. The tool provides an excellent and democratized method for analysis. Again, the risk is the misapplication of historical context. The view and analysis given by the model today is something that was beyond the capability of any of the decision-makers in the ancient Roman world. Ancient Roman understanding of the transportation network and costs would have been far less sophisticated. Roman decision making was less optimized than the decision making that can be done today with the interactive digital model.

The article by Richard White is a geographic information system (GIS) overview interspersed with historiography that left me just sad. In this article, we have a Stanford historian who has just discovered historical geography as if it never existed in the scholarly canon and renames it spatial history. I guess in Stanford they don’t pay attention to publications from Yale: see D. W. Meinig’s stellar historical geography, The Shaping of America: A geographical perspective on 500 years of history. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_W._Meinig ) Granted, digital techniques can be used to further the excellent work Meinig and other historical geographers started, but the digital techniques do not make their work irrelevant or the discipline of historical geography non-existent.

Finally, and more encouraging was Lincoln Mullen’s tutorial on producing thematic maps and using CartoDB as a method for producing them. Most historians will use thematic maps as they are trying to describe the variation of a place over time. All in all, I appreciate the expanded reach and capabilities that digital mapping brings. Given my undergraduate degree in geography and my constant interest in history, I would not think of conducting historical research in other than a geographic context. For me, it always about both space and time.

Transcribing an Army letter from 1800

Trying to decipher and transcribe old letters is something I’ve been doing for a couple of decades. I wish I could say it gets easier. For me, it hasn’t much. Partly because I was transcribing in spurts. Heavy into transcription for a month, and then not touching for three to six months. The transcription skill is similar to learning and using a foreign language; consistent use is better.

I was initially working only with letters from the Civil war era and the script wasn’t quite as removed from the cursive I was taught. Then I started working with older letters from the early 19th, or late 18th century and deciphering got harder. The S that looked like an f was more in use and spelling was less standard.

In the process of working with old letters, I did learn about name abbreviations like Saml for Samuel and Jno for John. Other abbreviations I ran into related to dates. Ult. for the Latin ultimo meaning the month preceding the current month. Inst.for the Latin phrase instante mense, meaning in this month.

For this week’s class exercise in transcription using the early papers of the American War Department, I picked a letter that related to procurement from the Springfield Armory in 1800. I picked that letter because I have a background in Army acquisition and I wanted to if there were similarities between 1800 and the last 20 years. There were. The letter refers to quarter end for fiscal measurement, and the author signs the letter “most respectfully”. In the Army today we report money quarterly, and every other time period, and we sign off with “very respectfully” or “respectfully”. Interesting to see the 200 years of continuity come through the difficulty in deciphering writing style.

Nonetheless, early 18th and 19th-century cursive is difficult to read. What has helped me are guides like Kip Sperry’s “Reading Early American Handwriting”, or the guide Cheek Genealogy left here: http://www.moonzstuff.com/articles/oldhandwriting.html

For some scribbles, however, I am unable to decipher them. If it just looks like a wavy line unless there is some clear flow in the sentence there is not much to be done. Luckily, the 1800 Springfield letter didn’t have too many of those. But where it’s better than a scrawl but still somewhat garbled then multiple interpretations can come into play.

I interpret the xxxxxx Ely in the Springfield letter as Hudson Ely. I could see where someone else could interpret it as Thomas Ely. I am not sure if my read of the name Hudson is correct. If a transcription is crowdsourced as many are today to save money, then the crowdsourced transcription needs review.

On another note, we got a tour and an interactive discussion with the archivists at the George Mason University Special Collections Research Center (SCRC). One of the archivist’s was scanning C-SPAN administrative records. It was instructive to see the lighting used to eliminate shadows and hear why the different digital file formats are used. It caused me to relook TIFF and JPEG definitions, and re-think whether for some of my historical mapping projects downloading the TIFF file would be better despite the much large file size.

Building an Omeka site

Once my wife and I stumbled onto her great-aunt’s part in the Willard Burke murder trial, I got interested in researching the trial and the participants. Thanks to some Sonoma County, California blogs, I quickly learned about the trial and the key players. Dr. Burke was the father of Lu Etta Smith’s child. The doctor owned a gold mine in Butte County that had just struck a rich vein. He attempted to murder Lu Etta to get rid of a claimant on his new found riches. Dr. Burke was convicted, sentenced to 10 years in San Quentin, and lost his appeal. His original defense attorney, Hiram Johnson, was elected Governor of California. In 1916, at the beginning of his last term as Governor, Johnson pardoned Dr. Burke. Relieving Dr. Burke of 7 years of the prison sentence and restoring his livelihood as a Doctor.

Which led me to the question, why did Governor Johnson pardon Dr. Burke? The blogs which were built primarily from newspaper articles from the time were either silent or speculative on the topic of the pardon. To possibly find an answer, I needed to see the pardon file if it existed, and any correspondence Governor Johnson may have left on the subject. I learned that the California State arch

Once my wife and I stumbled onto her great-aunt’s part in the Willard Burke murder trial, I got interested in researching the trial and the participants. Thanks to some Sonoma County, California blogs, I quickly learned about the trial and the key players.  Dr. Burke was the father of Lu Etta Smith’s child. The doctor owned a gold mine in Butte County that had just struck a rich vein.  He attempted to murder Lu Etta to get rid of a claimant on his new found riches. Dr. Burke was convicted, sentenced to 10 years in San Quentin, and lost his appeal. His original defense attorney, Hiram Johnson, was elected Governor of California.  In 1916, at the beginning of his last term as Governor, Johnson pardoned Dr. Burke. Relieving Dr. Burke of 7 years of the prison sentence and restoring his livelihood as a Doctor.

Which led me to the question, why did Governor Johnson pardon Dr. Burke? The blogs which were built primarily from newspaper articles from the time were either silent or speculative on the topic of the pardon.  To possibly find an answer, I needed to see the pardon file if it existed, and any correspondence Governor Johnson may have left on the subject. I learned that the California State archives had a pardon file, and the University of Berkeley had Governor Johnson’s personal papers. Luckily, I was going to California and had the time for some research.

The results of my research in Berkeley and in Sacramento are what I now am including in the Omeka site. The site when public will share with the world material that has been in the archives for over 100 years and will set straight some distortions that have crept into the historical record concerning the Burke trial and its aftermath.  One clear distortion was the amount of prison time that Dr. Burke served (3 years) and how much he had been relieved of (7 years).

The difficulties I experienced in putting the Omeka exhibit together were (1) having more data than was reasonable to display, (2) copyright restrictions, (3) selecting the focus for the 4000 word article, (4) appropriately referring to the items in the exhibit in the accompanying text, and (5) some difficulty getting the illustration function to display properly for text boxes near the bottom of the page.

From a couple of bursts of research, I have about 50 newspaper articles and over a hundred pages of Burke trial material. Deciding which items were the most appropriate to display was difficult. I evolved criteria of topic relevance followed by uniqueness; meaning was this the first time an item would make it up on the web. I had to forgo using some of the items due to copyright restrictions. The Bancroft Library of UC Berkeley forbids reproduction of the items in the Hiram W. Johnson papers. Of all of the items, what came from archival research was usually material that hadn’t been online yet. Beyond relevance and uniqueness, the other criteria I used was online legibility. Did the item display well?

Displaying well is can also be a function of text alignment to the figure or illustration. In a word processor, one can pretty much get text aligned with an illustration so that it displays well and flows with the text. Not as easily done in Omeka.

What I really liked about Omeka, though, was the ability to place annotation boxes on either text or a picture. The capability really enables one to interpret cursive, or a hard to read copy. Hopefully, a future release will enable one to provide article text with the illustration function. I experienced some difficulty in getting annotation boxes to display correctly if there was a lot of text and the box was near the bottom of the illustration. However, breaking up the annotation box into smaller boxes proved a reasonable workaround. All in all, I found Omeka to be an excellent mechanism for displaying archival material.

Murder trial item search

This search began one summer at the beach when my wife told me a tale about a G-string. Not any ordinary G-string found on the beach. No. The G-string in the story was the name of a cat. My wife’s great-great Aunt Blanche File, a retired piano teacher in Oakland, California had a cat named G string. The cat meowed in the key of G and was named accordingly. In the 1950s, Blanche’s teenage grandnieces laughed at the old woman when she would go outside to call the cat. It was funny to hear her calling for G-string. The teenagers thought of her as an eccentric, doddering, old-fashioned woman who wasn’t quite with it any longer. An amusement.

What her grand-nieces didn’t realize is that Blanche had a very interesting and action-packed life. In the 1880s most of Tulsa, Oklahoma, then in the Bad Lands, turned out to watch Blanche get full immersion baptized along with her brother in the middle of the Tulsa River. Her Baptist minister father ran a mission there for Native Americans.

In 1910, with the File family now moved to Oakland, California, and having survived the 1906 earthquake, Blanche was called to be a witness for the prosecution in a scandalous attempted murder trial. A trial followed by the national press. For a few days, Blanche and her testimony became national news. However, the trial and its aftermath were forgotten by her family. Blanche apparently never spoke of it. I only found out about it because I Googled Blanche on a whim after hearing the G-string story, and to me and my wife’s surprise, up popped the newspaper articles about the murder trial from 1910 and Blanche’s testimony. Some Sonoma County, California blogs popped up as well. The scandal is still a topic of discussion and folklore in Sonoma County, the location of the attempted murder. The trial and its story are also still of interest because as noted in a previous post, the defense and prosecuting attorneys are significant figures in California political history.

So where are the items to illustrate the story in a short six-item Omeka post to be found? The participants, and most if not all of their children are long dead. The documentary record can be found in Google books, newspaper archives, the collections of participants papers where they exist, and the trial, appeal, pardon, and prison records are in the California State Archives. Google books and a large number of the newspapers are online, and where they are publicly held as in a State Library system, are accessible as open source. Some of the newspapers are only accessible behind paywalls and come with a copyright restriction. The personal papers of Governor Hiram Johnson are available on microfilm and hard copy at the University of Berkeley Bancroft library. However, no photographic reproduction is allowed. A number of the items I would like to post fall into this category are not useable. An example is the agreement wherein Dr. Burke retained Johnson’s services as a defense attorney.  Some of Johnson’s diary entries are accessible online but come with similar use restrictions.

The trial, appeal, and pardon records are only available in hard copy at the California State Archives in Sacramento and when accessed are open source and can be displayed open source. Luckily, I’ve done the research in Sacramento and have photographic copies that can be used from the trial, appeal, and pardon.

Some ideas to pursue for “Little Odd Histories”

I have a couple of ideas on what to look into for a “Little Odd Histories” post. I imagine that they need to be small and odd, and not well known, or known at all. One idea is to describe the players in the pardon of an attempted murderer in 1916 by a California Governor and Presidential candidate. Another is to present the evidence that a fort the Union Generals thought was built by the Union Army was really built by the Confederates—this misconception contributed to a Union defeat. Another might be the rise and fall of the memorialization of the Confederate James Jackson an example of how one gets written in and out of history. And last, for now, were the Confederates so out of ammunition on the third day at Gettysburg that they were reduced to using nails as ammunition. The difficulty with the task is that in the end, nothing is small. In The Black Swan, Nassim Nicholas Taleb related the attempt of a novelist to describe everything that happened on one street corner in Paris at one point in time and failed. Too much to describe.

In the murderer example, the crime was committed in Santa Rosa California in 1910. The trial took all of 1911. The San Quentin prison term of ten years started in 1912. In the story, we have a gold mine, an illegitimate child, a flight to Japan and forcible return of a key witness, and a mysterious woman who attempts to bribe.  The conviction. The immediate appeal and its denial. A campaign for pardon starting with the collapse of the appeal. Around it all is the political life of the initial defense attorney who becomes the Progressive Republican Governor of California, a Presidential candidate, and to this day the state’s longest-serving senator. And his opponent, the Santa Rosa district attorney, who becomes to this day the longest-serving Democratic Congressman. The sources here are deep and wide. The question becomes how to focus, what to bring in, and what to leave out.

Alternatively, the fort that I claim was built by the Confederates as the result of a cavalry battle in June of 1864 has little direct source material. What was written about the fortification was written long after the battle. To support my claim requires an understanding of the battle, and the fort’s strategic, operational, and tactical situation. Reference is needed to contemporary maps. A lot to cover to get to support the “Odd” point.

Concerning “Odd”, the idea of tone and seriousness comes into play as does the need to make it readable by a general audience. If I did what happened with the attempted murder, I could take a somewhat playful tone and pursue a line of inquiry that goes: How to get rich? How to get rid of embarrassing claimants to one’s riches? How to blame the victim? How to bribe the victim? How to get rid of the witness? How to position the court battle for success? How to appeal? How to get your friends to get you a pardon? How to outlive them?  Each question answered with all. a short paragraph and with an accompanying artifact. The other ideas could be addressed with like questions. The challenge is how to keep it accurate, succinct and interesting.

Digital history: problems of sustainability and ethics

On the broad problem of sustaining audio, video, and text forms stored on digital platforms, Cohen and Rosenzweig list durability and inaccessibility and state that digital materials are notoriously fragile and require special attention to withstand changing technologies and user demands. In other words, it costs money and constant attention to produce, and continue to deliver digital media over time. If an effort to maintain a digital site is not undertaken, technology or procedural change may easily make that site inaccessible. Accessibility can also be impacted by market forces. Commercial operators can gain ownership of data and place that data behind a paywall, or limit access to it entirely through the action of perceived market advantage.

Cohen and Rosenzweig also note that with the use of world wide web come problems of quality and authenticity and that one, “…can find plenty of inaccurate history on the web”. Further, they argue that the technical capabilities of digital media provide forgers or the unscrupulous with an easier and cheaper means of production and delivery.

Mat Honan learned the hard way about the durability, accessibility, quality, and authenticity of his digital media, he got hacked. His stored material was modified or destroyed, although he was able to save about 75% of it. He learned from the experience and advocates for online, off-line, and off-site backups of material, stronger access security methods, and an awareness that ultimately the security of a hosted platform is not fully in the owners’ control. Again, an argument that long-term maintenance of a digital site requires thought, effort, and cost.

Jennifer Howard argued those using digital media need to do so with an eye towards long term archival strategy. Without such a strategy, digital media will disappear into inaccessibility. For Ms. Howard, libraries and digital media centers need to play a role in the long-term storage of digital production, “if it is going to be around to be of use and influence”. In Augustine’s case, his autobiography would not be with us if many librarians of the ancient world and medieval worlds hadn’t preserved copies in libraries and archives. To survive in the long run, digital media may need similar care.

Safiya Noble is disturbed and offended by the lack of hierarchical control in digital media and networks. She argued that that the ability to produce and deliver unregulated speech helps to maintain and perpetuate racial and sexual stereotypes with uneducated or unsuspecting audiences. She advocates for government regulation of digital media content providers like Google. Ms. Noble’s concerns on group stereotyping and the licentiousness of some web content are valid. Whether the appropriate path is for the imposition of some form of censorship, controlled by the government as she advocates is not at all clear. The first question would be, which government? Ultimately, Ms. Noble’s concern, like the other authors is one of the quality and accuracy of the material. My thought is that in free market societies, the selections made by libraries or digital centers will determine the long-term survivability of historical materials on digital media. In societies not governed by the free market, political or ideological concerns will create the criteria, and funding, for preservation.

Defining digital history

For me, digital history is a temporary label that seems to be needed as historians adjust to the implementation and evolution of modern information technology. One imagines that as historians began to move from oral histories to written ones that for a while history was called “papyrus” or “scroll” history, and then after a time as the new technology was adopted, just history again. Similarly, in the move from the written to the printed word—print or book histories, and then with adoption, just history again. In the end, the tool doesn’t necessarily change the ends of researching, compiling, and delivering a history, but the mechanisms, the economics, and what is possible to do with them change in a much more powerful way.

The audience reach of a scroll was superior to the reach of the individual relaying and oral history from memory. Today, we know about someone like Augustine of Hippo even though he perished in the Vandal’s siege of Hippo in 430 A.D. because his writings on scrolls had been disseminated throughout the Roman empire and were maintained and accessible to an educated elite. With the advent of the printed text, Augustine’s writings became more widely available. With digital technology, they are available globally 24/7 in video, audio, and text formats.

In the current transition of history from print to digital, a transition that has been underway for about 60 years now, digital history, to use the transitional term, is the application of the tools of information technology to the practice of history. So, what are the tools? The digital tools are computer and computer-based network hardware and software and the implementation standards that enable far more efficient production, manipulation, and dissemination of voice, video, and text used by historians for some historical project’s end. Historians include using Cohen and Roy Rosenzweig’s broad definition: “amateur enthusiasts, research scholars, museum curators, documentary filmmakers, historical society administrators, classroom teachers, and history students at all levels”. When compared to print media, digital media and networks provide historians and their audiences with more cost-effective methods. These include methods for storage, access to materials, flexible analysis and presentation, more diverse means of analysis and presentation, ease of manipulating data, audience interaction with the presentation, and freedom from hierarchical control.

Introduction

Today, I am in transition to my next career as a researcher and writer of different aspects of history, biography, and, maybe political philosophy. I have had a few careers already: Marine during the Vietnam War, international communications satellite controller and engineer, information technology manager, transformational change consultant, small business executive, and US Army acquisition program manager. Through all of them, I was always reading and researching history and brought a historical understanding and context into my various jobs. 

In the humanities, I’ve studied European history, American history and historical geography, and American government with a foundation in political philosophy.  My current historical research interests include: the life and letters of Captain Edward Brownson USA (1843-1864), the role of the Orestes A. Brownson family in the American Civil War, some aspects of the first and second battle of Ream’s Station, Virginia in 1864, the 1968 Tet Offensive and the first digital computer casualty in a war, and an assessment of the Progressive Governor of California, Hiram Johnson’s pardon of convicted attempted murderer, Dr. Willard Buke, in 1913. On the political philosophy front, I am working to master the thought of Italian political philosopher, Augusto Del Noce, and his analysis of the post-World War Two evolution and intertwining of Marxist and nihilistic thought. Not to mention his suggestion that the thought of Simone Weil pointed a way out.

I became interested in history while playing with toy soldiers in the sandbox as a kid during the Centennial of the Civil War with, and my father’s encouragement to read his copy of Bruce Catton’s trilogy on the Army of the Potomac, and some of his historical novels. The interest in history was linked with an interest in politics by a visit to a Congressman’s office on Capitol Hill in the late1960s. Then furthered by an internship with the Virginia State Legislature, and by a college geography project where I studied the settlement patterns of former slaves in Montgomery County Virginia. As an intern, I heard senators refer to the, “War of Northern Aggression”, and I worked near the Home for Confederate Widows wherein five or so of them still lived. In the geography project, I interviewed children and grandchildren of slaves, and through that came into contact with Professor Richard Dickerson who studied the impact of the Freedman’s Bureau schools on the strength of the slave family. Which led to my discovery in the Montgomery County archives of one of the few remaining registers of slave marriages (slaves were not allowed to formally marry under Virginia law), and a related register of manumitted slaves. Both subsequently published by the National Genealogical Society. All of the foregoing immersed me in the Civil War and its aftermath, but as an avocation, my work life was in engineering and management.

Before this class, my online presence was found on my personal Facebook, LinkedIn, and Twitter sites, on Army Facebook and Twitter sites, and on various Army¸ trade association and news media websites. Because I had a government position, was part of an investment management company, or was consulting with clients with confidentiality expectations, I kept my personal opinions to myself and my communications in those forums were limited and of a technical nature. I used Facebook for family posts. On Twitter, I have a private account, and although I follow over 1000 people, I have posted or retweeted maybe 12 tweets in ten years.

Conversely, I do have a couple of Blogger websites and one WordPress site that I put up between 2009 and 2011 when I had some spare time, and before I went full time into intense Army work. Those sites have historical content related to the history and biography research interests listed above.

The class and the articles from week one’s readings make it clear to me that I need to make all the sites that I control consistent and interrelated. I am in a transition, post-Army retirement, to a new career as a researcher and writer of history and biography. After looking at myself online, it’s clear that my professional identity is anchored in my past career as a management consultant and as an Army acquisition program manager. The exception is the Blogger sites and the one WordPress site, but those do not easily come up in a Google search. My task with this class is to use the class website as the vehicle for working out my new online identity and transferring that identity to all of my other sites. I imagine I can also transition my pre-existing Blogger and WordPress sites into the site I am making for class. Ending the semester with online sites that are more consistent with a historical research and writing identity.

Newspaper articles and poems written between 1859 and 1861 by Edward Brownson (1843-1864).

The following is an extract of an unpublished notebook that contains the articles and poems that were published in New York City and New Jersey newspapers by Edward P. Brownson (1843-1864). The articles and poems in this notebook date from August 2, 1859 through March 3, 1861. There are 14 entries in all, two handwritten and 12 newspaper clippings. The newspaper clippings include four poems and 8 articles. The articles cover topics of New York and New Jersey travel and city life, Abraham Lincoln as a candidate for President in 1860, historical fictions set in North Africa or Spain that illustrate in the context of the conflict between Christendom and Islam a moral point on loyalty, or vengeance and betrayal, and the description of a debate at Fordham on the centralization of power as a national policy.  
In 1859, Edward was a student at St. John’s College, Fordham, New York (now Fordham University). He graduated in June of 1860 with a Bachelor of Arts and began working as a secretary for his father, the journalist and reviewer, Orestes Augustus Brownson (1803-1876).  
None of the articles were published under Edward’s real name. All of the articles are signed with the male pseudonyms of Reginald Fitzbrun, Obadiah P. Tompkins, F.C. Raymond, or Emile Fitzbrun.  The romance poems were signed with the female pseudonym, Frances.
The articles were published in the New Jersey Journal (2) , The Elizabeth (New Jersey) Unionist (6), The Adopted Citizen (2), The Herald and Visitor (1), and the Irish-American (1).
Dennis P. Kelly April 3, 2011
Page 1, Entry 1 (Handwritten Title Page).
The Only
Authentic and Complete Collection
of the
Publications
of
Edward Brownson
Vol I.
Commenced at Elizabeth, N.J. Aug. 1859.
Finished at Elizabeth, N.J. July, 1861
Page 2. Blank.
Page 3, Entry 2 (Newspaper clipping).
Aug. 2nd 1859
POETRY
[For the New Jersey Journal.]
AN INVITATION TO A FRIEND
Inscribed to J.M.G.
Come, dear James, your city roof awhile forsake
And at my rural home a meal partake:
Though humble the food that there you meet,
Yet an honest heart waits its friend to greet.
No ornaments there nature hide,
But merrily o’er the threshold wide
The cooling breezes sing as you come,
While joyful faces welcome you home.
No costly wines on my table are,
No eastern dainties sought from afar
But rosy peaches my table grace,
And plums from the orchard are next in place:
A noble heifer waits your coming;
My own pressed beer o’er the cups is running;
But the last that adorns my offering board
is a bottle of wine by my grand-sire stored.
Reginald Fitzbrun
Pages 3-4, Entry 3 (Newspaper clipping).
[For the New Jersey Journal.]
Aug. 23, 1859.
JONATHN’S VISIT TO HOLLAND.
            Jonathan arrived at his nineteenth year, without ever having proceeded beyond the precincts of his father’s humble farm, and doubtless he would never have left that hallowed spot, if he had not one day overheard some neighbors discoursing on the wealth and greatness of Holland. His ambition was presently roused, and he went home a new man. He was determined to visit the celebrated country, whose praises were recounted in such distant lands, and neither obstacles nor entreaties could force him from his project. In vain his sisters wept, in vain his mother implored: Jonathan was resolute; and a mountain might have been sooner moved from its base than he from his settled purpose.
            His family, at length, finding all opposition useless, resolved that his going should reflect no dishonor upon them, as far, at least, as their means and skill might be exerted in preparing his outfit. Accordingly when Jonathan ascended the ship that was to bear him away, he found himself the fortunate possessor of six linsey-woolsey shirts, with two checked ones for solemn occasions, a cravat made from the remnant of his departed progenitor’s pocket handkerchief, several pairs of sock[s] all knit by his diligent sisters, a pair of corduroy breeches, together with numerous other indispensables not necessary to be detailed. In addition to these the care of an aged spinster aunt had provided the young traveler with some few gold coins, while a languishing maiden of the youth’s acquaintance encumbered him with the picture of her loving features, taken on a small allowance of canvas, which little parcel Jonathan reverently deposited in his pocket without any further examination.
            The voyage was long and tedious, but after a suitable experience of sea-sickness, the Yankee lad had arrived in safety at the great harbor of Amsterdam, where straightway depositing on a retired spot about the wharf his trunk, in which all his worldly possessions were centered, he seated himself by the side of this, his silent companion, and directly fell to musing on his fortunes.
            How long he might have continued thus is uncertain; but later a few minutes a passerby muttered something to him, and at the same time pointed towards the neighboring town. Jonathan, for the first time noticing the houses, concluded it would not be amiss to have a nearer view of them: so, starting up from his sedentary position, he walked on rapidly along a street which proceeded through the heart of the city. First, however, he did not neglect to ask the nearest traveler, “who owned all them ships over thar?”
“Kannichtferstan,” was the reply, and both moved on. “Kannitferstan,” muttered Jonathan, pursuing his way. ” This Mr. Kannitferstan must be a rather rich man; I reckon we must get acquainted. I suppose he might help a feller on in business, if he’d mind to. Wal, here’s a lot of splendid houses; p’rhaps they’re his too — ain’t that so stranger? “
He added aloud to a person passing.
“Kannichtfestan,” said the other, staring wildly at Jonathan. “Wal, that’s just what I suspected,” said the Yankee, pursuing his soliloquy, ” but ye needn’t look so all-fired sharp at a feller for it. Jings, this is a famous place, after all; nothing to do but to have ships and build houses. I guess Sue wouldn’t like the place very bad.”
            As this and other happy visions crowded on his imagination, he was roused by the mournful tolling of a distant bell, and at the same time a funeral procession passed along the street. All the better feelings of his nature were immediately awakened, and in compassionate sorrow he doffed his hat and joined himself to the mournful train. When the last sod was thrown over the new-made grave, he ventured to break silence by whispering to his neighbor: “Friend, who’s that poor man that’s died?”
“Kannichtferstan,” replied the other very demurely. “Kannitferstan !” cried Jonathan, starting as if a cannon ball had struck at his feet; “Kannnitferstan ! what, him as owns all the ships and fine houses, and has got plenty of money?” he at length found voice to ask his companion; when, satisfied at receiving no negative, he continued muttering to himself as he hastened to return to the wharf: “Ah, poor Kennitferstan, poor man, what good is all your houses, and your ships, and your money and everything to you now?  You ain’t no better off for them, and you can’t use them no more. And as I suppose it will sometime or other be with me; and what’s the use anyway spending all your time to get rich? Sue had just as soon be poor, and I don’t care a bit if she hain’t got no money. So, I’ll just put about home. Mother and the gals, I guess, would like to see me again by this time.
            With this wise resolution, the Yankee returned to the quay, but it was all in vain that he looked for the trunk he had left there in the morning. To add to this difficulty, night was coming on, and he had no place for lodging. In this dilemma, he noticed a ship bound for New England; and on inquiring of the captain he was told it would sail an hour. Fortunately, Jonathan’s little stock of money was safe about him, and partly by means of this limited inducement, partly by promises of labor, he was allowed a passage, and ere long was borne out on the bosom of the broad Atlantic. When he arrived at his own house he found his family as rejoiced to see him as if he had brought with him all the wealth of Europe. Moreover, his faithful Sue despised him not for his mishaps, but in after years bestowed on him inestimable pleasure of having the unbounded right to provide for her maintenance, while the same blessing was shortly after claimed by a host of young hopefuls, one of, by no means, the least hopeful of which is the humble recorder of his ancestor’s glory.
Obadiah P. Tompkins.
Page 4, Entry 4 (Newspaper clipping).
Elizabeth, June 25th, 1860.
THE ELIZABETH UNIONIST
Mr. Editor:
            A few words uttered, not long ago, by Mr. Lincoln, have given rise to some reflections on my part which may not be altogether uninteresting to your readers, or even without some value in the coming struggle. Abraham Lincoln has said that “he will not bind himself now, to be — when elected — the slave of any political party.”
            Such an expression, considered merely by itself, is of little account; for who can say if it be really from the heart, or from the lips?  But, when a man declares he will not enslave himself to gain a high and lucrative post, while every act of his life substantiates the assertion, while the whole harmonizes with it, then, indeed, we may believe he speaks sincerely, and that he will be true to his words as his words are true to him. We may expect, consequently, that such a man, if chosen to the most powerful office in our country, will never find himself obliged to give the most important post in a vast city to a swindler, or to hold pardon ready for a notorious criminal, or to scatter the noblest offices among the worst of men, all of whom have only one claim to his liberality and protection — the common tie of party. We may expect that a man who thus asserts his freedom, will sit in the presidential chair shackled by no laws but those of honor, duty and patriotism.
            Now it is evident that we are right in presuming that Mr. Lincoln, when presiding over the government, will be such a man as we have just described, provided his character and acts be such as to give sure grounds that he will substantiate his words. Need I enter into details to make this appear? Are long proofs required to show Abe Lincoln and honest man, and a good citizen? Even his enemies never accuse him of dishonesty. They say he has been inactive, asleep, that he worked his way into life by hard labor; just as Cincinnatus of old, who trudged on with his plow until his country called for his services, but then none was ever more zealous for his native land. Uprightness, too, is one of the first requisites of a citizen — Mr. Lincoln has it. An honorable discharge of duty in a public office (if placed therein) comes next. As a Senator, Mr. Lincoln shines not indeed for pompous and empty orations, yet show me a deed of injustice to which he lent himself, an act of  corruption in which he was a party — a good measure which he might have supported, but did not ?
            Mr. Lincoln was not reared in luxury; he is a self-made man. He knows the ups and downs of life — he is inured to every fortune, and is withal a man of sterling character, so that we may set it down as a principle on which he will act, when he says he will be no party slave. For the glory of our republic, I would wish to say the same of a Houston and others, and to look on the contest already begun as one of the glorious contests of fifty years ago, when the least remarkable among presidential candidates was worthy of the chair to which he aspired. But were I to say if all those who now stand arranged before the public, soliciting the votes of the nation to make them the head of our government, it would be abusing my right as a correspondent which allows me to say the bitter truth, though not the sweet falsehood. It can be safely said of one alone — of Abraham Lincoln.
F.C.R.
Elizabeth, June 25th, 1860.
Page 5, Entry 5 (Newspaper clipping).
Elizabeth, July 21st, 1860.
THE ELIZABETH UNIONIST.
Thoughts on the Visionary.
            “Blessed is the man that shall behold the houris of Paradise,” sang the Arabian, and straightway a thousand sages fell to dreaming on the delights mentioned  by the poet, and then cut their throats in ecstasy over the wonders of their own visions.
            Our illustrious century boasts not, however, of such glorious fortunes; the minstrels of our days in vain tune their lyres, in vain pour forth their unearthly lays; — such magical results are no more given to verses and rhymes. Still the visionary is not yet powerless; its shrines are not yet deserted by any class of society. Otherwise indeed we must own ourselves inferior to the ancients; while it is the policy of our enlightened age to assert its progress in everything, as much in art as in literature, as much in whistles and nutmegs as in exordiums and perorations.
            In old times the visionary held its sway in the areopagus, as now in the British Parliament, where oft amid protracted sessions and midnight debates the venerable heads of the nation indulge in pleasing visions of noble suppers and royal dinners to beguile the hours while the reality is delayed. So Croesus, in his evening thoughts grasped the golds of eastern worlds and sank to rest on the downy beds of India; thus Cleopatra beheld her runaway Caesars again prostrate at her feet; Socrates, his Aspasia restored to an amiable temper. Some persons even affirm that the whole lives of the ancient philosophers were nothing but a continual series of visions.
            If we look now at our own age we shall soon see how much we have progressed even in the line of which I speak. Visions are no longer confined to amorous youths or debilitated greybeards; every year of life has its peculiar set of them, increasing to the end. The lovely babe that rests so gently on its mother’s arm is dreaming of sugar and sweetmeats. That clumsy, ill-starred child, who has smashed the china in aiming for the preserves, is not without his own peculiar visions of an offended matron. Yonder college lads revel in the pleasure of anticipated cigars and smashes, marred by [no] frowning prefects, and in coming watches and beavers. That youth standing apart there has a vision of an L.L.D., or the presidential chair before him. That mischievous looking fellow who brushes by you has thoughts of an alchemical explosion, in which his revered professor enjoys a prominent, though unenvied position. In the convent over the way, there is such a myriad of visions of hats and beaux, etc, coursing through the brains of each, that I dare not begin to recount them.
            Let us for a moment look at some of the persons passing by us on the great Broadway:
            This exquisitely attired young gentleman is a person of sentiment; observing him closely, you perceive he does not know where he is, so intently is he occupied in surveying a tender image of his imagination, the original of which riveted his gaze at the Japanese festival. That prodigious being rolling along is an alderman; he is largely indulging in savory visions of turtle soup, etc., to become realities on Heenan’s arrival. Yonder slender gentleman dreams of a subterranean railroad; his companion, of crystallized carbon. This aged female speculates on the probability of Massachusetts’ becoming a tea-growing state; that young lady on the expansion of crinoline and a universe of beaux; that matron of maturer years on the misery of war and a flounced dress.
            Step into the counting house — the clerks are dreaming of next Sunday. Enter the warehouse — a dashing nag courses through the merchants brain. Go to the barber’s — even while lathering you, Sambos’ wooly head is filled with visions of a future Dinah and a dozen dusky little darkeys. Peep into the editor’s room — but here there is no dreaming; all is real.
            Thus, then, we are all going through a series of visions from the cradle to the grave; and is not the land beyond the grave a land of visions?
F.C. Raymond
Page 6, Entry 6 (Newspaper clipping).
July 21st, 1860.
THE ADOPTED CITIZEN
            We publish this week an interesting correspondence from New Jersey. By the-by, will the writer oblige us by writing more frequently.
Elizabeth, N.J. July 16, 1860
EDS. Adopted Citizen, — Dear Sir: —
            Your courageous little paper has already invaded this remote land of New Jersey; the weekly issue of the Adopted Citizen regularly claims its place among the periodicals exposed for sale at the single newspaper depot in this pretty little city. Observing your invitation and inducement to contributors, and aware of your partiality to items of Catholic news and events of importance, I shall take it upon myself to inform you of certain circumstances that have lately engrossed the common conversation here. To tell you the truth, they are the only matters that have really aroused attention here, at least during the three years since I emigrated to this place. To be sure, the arrival of a stranger is a notable affair, and so is a runaway horse, or a lame dog, or a group of a dozen individuals; still these create merely a secondary interest, while the transactions of which I am about to speak have set the tongues of the whole community a-going.
            Perhaps, however, you would like in the first place to become a little acquainted with this city of Elizabeth — the fairest flower of New Jersey. It was one of the earliest settlements of the Union. Jacob Van Kuyter and his hardy little band of Dutchmen, attracted by the beauties of Elizabethport, established themselves here. The town then increased rapidly until the wars of the Dutch, when it sank into a sober, settled village. Ten years since it took a fresh start, gained a municipal charter, and now rivals Newark; being extensively engaged in trade with New York, Philadelphia, and the coal districts of Pennsylvania. As an instance of the revolutionary spirit of the city’s ancestors, it is the tradition that on the rumor of the passage of a body of Hessians nearby, the whole town, men, women and children, enthusiastically armed themselves, and rushing to the outskirts of the village awaited with patriotic ardor the coming of the enemy. The Hessians, however, were reserved for another fate; the glory of their capture was destined for Washington. This time they met neither with undeserved success, nor yet with defeat; but the lion of New Jersey was aroused, and had his paw but grasped the foe, who can imagine the consequences?
            You may therefore, Mr. Editor, establish it as a fact that New Jersey only wants to get aroused to become wide-awake.
            To return now to the news of the past week. Our venerable prelate, the Right Rev. Bishop Bayley, on the 12th administered confirmation here to upwards of a hundred children, the chosen body of this thriving little parish.   Their appearance was worthy of their religion. As the boys and girls slowly and solemnly filed up the nave of our new church, something of the sublimity of the scene must have impressed itself even on one not of our faith. I certainly never before witnessed such a sight. I have seen thousands marching up the long aisles of churches more stately than even this continent can boast, while gigantic organs pealed forth their majestic notes; but the scene could not surpass the humbler grandeur of the spectacle exhibited in the village church. The address of the Bishop was worthy of the man, of the time, and of the place: every word of it was so well chosen, so appropriate and necessary, that any attempt to to transcribe it unless entire, (which unfortunately I am unable to do,) would be but to mutilate it.
            Another matter of much discussion is the late baptism by immersion of twenty four converted brethren among the Baptists of Newark. I was not myself present at the ceremony. I did not care to be. It would not have interested me much; nor do I think the recital of it would greatly interest you, since it is always the same cold, lifeless act, except when it occasionally chances to be quite happily (for tired spectators) varied by a more thorough dunking than desirable, or by the involuntary immersion and second baptism of the officiating minister himself.
            Hoping that these items may be acceptable to you and your readers, I remain,
respectfully yours.
Emile Fitzbrun.
P.S. I have just been informed that the evening train from New York will bring down six handsome beaux to stay for the summer. I need assure you there are many already in ecstasies, for beaux, it is well known, are rare in this part of the world.
Pages 7-9, Entry 7 (Newspaper clipping).
August 4th, 1860
Written for the Elizabeth Unionist.
Spanish Loyalty.
An Episode in the History of Spain
By F. C. Raymond
CHAP. I.
            On one of the hills that encircled the beautiful Vega of Grenada, there formerly stood a lofty fortress which overhung the principal pass that led into Christian Spain. In the time of the Moorish Monarch, Boabdil, this castle was inhabited by a Moslem chieftain, known throughout the country by the designation of El Zegri, — in our language, The Fierce. For forty years this chieftain had commanded the important post to which his sovereign had appointed him; for forty years he had vindicated his fame as one of the best officers of the Saracen army, and the most deadly enemy of the foes of Mahomet. None, indeed, of all the infidel host, could boast of greater ardor in the pursuit of the Christians; none loved better to enslave or slaughter them, peasants as well as nobles, women and children, even the babe at the breast.
            The Moslem lord passed most of his time sitting in the loftiest tower of his mighty mansion, and his eagle eye never left the road that led towards the provinces of the Spaniards. When he remarked the return of his spies, who ever watched the unguarded moment of the Christians, his heart beat high to learn their news; his breast swelled with impatience, and he would fly down the turret stairs, leap on his charger, and dash on to meet his messenger, burning to learn if there was a prospect of another expedition against his hated adversaries. And if the spy could tell of the fatal negligence of a Spanish fortress, the face of that old warrior, now beyond his sixtieth year, would light up with a glare of fury, of fiendish delight; he would hasten back to his den, arouse his soldiers, and fly at their head to seize on his wretched prey.
One morning a scout rode in view of the old Saracen’s stronghold and El Zegri, as he was wont, flew down to meet him. But he was noticed to delay with his messenger longer than usual, to make more enquiries of him, to listen to his answers with more than ordinary attention; and when he returned he rode slowly, and his head was bent down in thought. Arriving at the courtyard, he gave his horse into the hands of a groom, delivered some orders to an attendant, and passed silently up to his own apartment in the castle. He sat a moment in his chair to collect his thoughts, then wrote a message to the Sultan of Grenada. The message reads thus:
“El Zegri, commander of Ilcouzil, to El Boabdil, sovereign of Grenada:
The Christian Lord, De Guzman, is negligent in his fortress, and I haste to tear it from him. Mahomet’s foes have assembled under their monarchs, and are now four day’s journey from the Ge Guzman’s castle, six from Grenada. Let your officers be wary and on the watch; send a trusty man to fill my place in my absence, for there is danger in the expedition which I undertake.”
Having dispatched this missive, he proceeded to buckle on his armor, and afterwards came down again into the courtyard. Here he found a good band of his followers in waiting, while adventurers who had been appraised by signal, poured in from the surrounding country. At length some five hundred cavaliers were assembled, all cased in mail. El Zegri took his station at their head and led the way. The tramping of the troops thundered over the drawbridge; a moment they glanced at the Vega with all its verdant beauties spread out on one side of them, and at the rough road on the other, then passed on and were lost in the defiles of the mountains. Those who noticed the Moslem chief on that day, said that he seemed more calm than customary; but they knew not it was the calmness of desperation — the calmness of passion. Of all the Christians El Zegri hated most De Guzman; and certainly he would not have exposed himself to so much peril, to go within so few days journey of the royal army, to revenge his king or his prophet, or anyone at all but himself.
CHAP. II.
The Marquis De Guzman, on whom the Saracen’s wrath was about to burst, lived at a distance of a little more than two days journey from his enemies. In age he was nearly equal to his adversary; in feats of arms he had often commanded the admiration of Europe, and was esteemed among the most redoubtable knights along the Moorish borders. At this time he was engaged in preparing for the reception of Ferdinand and Isabella, who, with a large number of troops were expected to stop there on their way to chastise the Infidels. Trusting to the near vicinity of the royal forces whom he believed to be within three or four days march, and hourly approaching, he did not deem it necessary to maintain that vigilance which he would otherwise have considered imperative. The sentinels and officers on duty caught this feeling of security from their leader, so much so that they accounted an occasional rest on their guard a matter of no great importance.
The old Marquis had an only son, just grown into manhood, on whom he looked with all a father’s pride and affection. This son, on the second day after El Zegri’s departure from Ilcouzil, had gone out several miles from his parent’s castle on a pleasure party, along with many ladies and gentlemen, who had congregated in the neighborhood to be present at the arrival of the sovereigns. They had arrived at a little grassy valley, surrounded by mountains, whose high, bleak tops rose high above the verdure that covered their sides. Here they rested, spread out their noonday meal, and the grove soon resounded with their feasting and rejoicing.
By chance, one of the party, in the act of raising the wine cup to his lips, cast his eyes straight before him. What does he see that he starts back speechless, with eyes aghast in fear and horror, and drops the goblet from his trembling hands? The Moslems are upon them! An instant more, and shouts of terror on the one hand, and the war-cry of the Moors, “El Zegri! Strike for the Prophet!” fills the woods and echoes from the mountains. El Zegri was indeed there. By day and night he had toiled on with his companions, over mountains and through ravines, over rivers and torrents, he urged by revenge, they by the hope of fame and booty. Fortune had now thrown the Christians in their way. But yet they were not to conquer them without a struggle. The Spanish cavaliers, prompted by their own valor, grasped their swords at once, and spurred to desperation by the imminent danger of the helpless females who cried around them for protection, made many an Islamite bite the dust, and fought until overpowered and slain by the numbers that pressed on them.
Of all the Christian knights only one remained; El Zegri wanted few prisoners. The young De Guzman had in vain dashed into the thickest of the combat; in vain he had killed four of his foes; the Saracens for some reason would not kill him; they preferred to have him their captive. A small guard was left to conduct the miserable remains of the pleasure party to Grenada, while El Zegri, with his single warrior prisoner, pushed on to grasp his long-sought prey.
CHAP. III.
At last the Moslems reached the fortress of De Guzman; but if the old man had been negligent before, he was certainly not so now. Two fugitives who had escaped amid the slaughter of their companions, arriving a short distance in advance of the Moors, carried the news of their arrival and attack to the Christian commander. De Guzman immediately sent a messenger to hasten the arrival of the royal army, which should have been by this time within two days journey, called his forces together within his castle, drew up the draw-bridge, closed the gates, arranged the archers that their places, buckled on his armor, and calmly awaited the enemy, who were already in sight.
El Zegri halted with arrow shot of the fortress, and presently a horseman bearing a white flag, was seen coming from the Infidel body toward the Spaniards. The herald demanded admittance to parlay with the commander. But De Guzman only stepped forth upon the battlements with his principal officers around him, and cried, — “Speak your tidings where you are.” The Moslems been declared, “that the great chief El Zegri, ordered the immediate surrender of the castle and all in it to his mercy; and that he had sworn, if this order was refused, to raze it to the ground, and put to death all in it, as he would, on the herald’s return, slay the commander’s only son.” De Guzman cast a glance toward the Saracen array, and they’re beheld his only son kneeling on the ground, with his hands behind his back, while a Moor stood on either side, holding an uplifted axe. The gleam of the steel, as the sun’s rays flashed back from it, pierced the father’s heart and numbed all its powers of action. He stood like one in a trance; the silence around was intense, fearfully so; the steel clad warriors stirred not even the rings of their mail; every face grew pale at the words of the herald.
The messenger demanded an answer to his summons. The commander at that sound return to life, and bade him wait a few moments, then motioning his officers to follow, stepped into his counsel room. Seating himself in his chair of office, and laying his helmet on the table beside him, he requested the opinion of each one present as to his reply.
It was a terrible thing for those officers; they were called pronounce sentence of life or death on their leader’s only son; such at least to them seemed the only point at issue, so completely was their own danger forgotten in the wretched position of their general. Many, out of affection, advised to let the soldier of Mahomet have his will, and give up to him their post. Some spoke of a sudden sortie, hoping that the unexpected fierceness of the attack might paralyze their enemies, as it were, or by making them look to their own safety, obtain time to rescue the captive. But they knew not the Saracen foe. A few old veterans, when it came their turn to speak, hung down their heads and were silent; for neither could they find it in their hearts to counsel the father against the life of his child, nor yet consent to the ignominy, the treachery of abandoning their post.
De Guzman read the thoughts of all. When the last had ended he arose, and merely saying, “Follow me,” again walked forth on the battlements. He turned to the herald and spoke in a clear, composed voice, which not a sound, not a throb interrupted: “Tell your Moslem master, that De Guzman has received this castle in charge from his sovereign, and to none but his sovereign will he render it up. And tell him, too,” — he did not falter yet, — “blood weighs not with my King.”
It was a sad sight to behold that aged man, like another Brutus, sacrificing his son. His long, white hair hanging down on his iron armor, his eyes lit up with a fire that glowed along his face all furrowed with wrinkles, his full, manly countenance, sorrowful, yet stern, unrelenting even for a son, when duty clashed against affection. Not a heart was there that did not soften, not a breast that was not fired with enthusiasm, not a hand that grasped not a sword, eager for battle. Their heavy mail rung out as they moved to their stations, and there they stood with no hope, no will, no soul for anything but victory or death.
As the herald wrote off De Guzman forbore to look at him, and retired to his place within the fortress. But those who watched the movements of the Saracens, after El Zegri had again spoken with his emissary, saw for a moment the gleam of two axes, and then beheld the head of the Christian prisoner roll on the ground. No sound on either side gave notice that the work was consummated. The Spaniards who observed it tightened their grasp on their swords; the Moors were not all ferocious enough to exult over such cruelty. The Morisco chief seemed indeed beside himself with joy; he gazed long and steadily at the bleeding body, he spurned it with his foot; looking from the murdered child to the castle which held the parent, he muttered, “The father suffers through his son.”
When he was somewhat sated with the spectacle he ordered his soldiers to storm the castle. A shower of arrows greeted them, but nothing daunted, they moved on fearlessly. Brave and fierce was the onset, as bravely and fiercely was it received. For two days every inch of the battlements was a thousand times contested for. Many a hero fell on both sides. At last El Zegri, despairing of success, resolved no longer to continue in such hazard as he was while the royal army was in three days journey. True it had for some reason delayed its further progress, but the news of the presence of the Moors must’ve reached it. He turned, therefore, on his road homeward to Grenada.
This route led him through the same valley that had been the scene of the late massacre. He arrived at the spot where the Spanish knights had been slain, but he found a detachment of Christian cavaliers awaiting to revenge on him their slaughter. The contest begins; the crescent falls before the cross. De Guzman by some chance is there, and he singles out the murderer of his son. The Christian and the Infidel fight; they fall, but the Morisco lord lies stiff in death, but the stamp of hell on his countenance. The Spaniard’s wound is not mortal. Of all that brilliant array that set out on that expedition with El Zegri, not one ever carried the tidings of his fate back to Ilcouzil.
Pages 10-11, Entry 8 (Newspaper clipping).  
 THE ADOPTED CITIZEN.
Saturday, August 11, 1860.
States Hotel, Saratoga, Aug. 4.
EDS. Adopted Citizen, — Dear Sirs: —
Your welcome sheet, after a roundabout course brought me the pleasant information that you take interest enough in New Jersey to attach some importance to the news of one of its chief cities. It was my intention to speak further of Elizabeth, but I was brought to a decided standstill by the formidable fact that Elizabeth news was all “played out.” Here was a halt; my venerated uncle however helped me on by the very natural suggestion: “Let Jersey go to the bugs; talk of where you are now.” “Good advice,” remarks the proverb, “is a Pearl not to be cast aside.”
Now, when so much has been spoken and scribbled about watering places and summer resorts, and when every penny daily has a special correspondent at each particular one, it is slightly difficult to find anything new to say of them. None on the continent can stand description unless the Salt Lake of Utah, or the North Pole, and these I shall not attempt to describe without ocular knowledge. A few words, therefore about the people who are here; for they, like the bits of glass in a kaleidoscope, though always the same, present different pictures according as they vary in disposition.
I experienced a foretaste of my Saratoga friends on my way up the North River in one of the steamers. A party of young “bloods,” having resolved on adopting the water cure, congregated together for the purpose of destroying the liquors which they chanced to have with them at the time. After patiently spilling a considerable quantity of said spirits down their throats, their heroic and persevering act filled them with such an exuberance of gladness that they could not refrain from breaking forth into cheers of exultation and loud applause of each other’s scourge. Lest, however, injury might come to them, a deputation was sent exhorting them to moderate their joy. But they were so firmly bent on water cure, now became displeased, in vindication of their conduct they convened a general assembly of the passengers, and each in turn for upwards of two hours fiercely declared himself “to be a citizen of these free United States of America,” and yelled out at the highest pitch of his voice that “gag law won’t go down with citizens of these free United States of America.”
Whether the audience were finally convinced by these weighty and pertinent arguments, I cannot exactly state, inasmuch as I went to sleep while the discussion was impending to dream that citizenship in the United States constituted a universal defense.
On reaching Saratoga in the morning, I was much struck by the number of maiden aunts and matronly ladies rather beyond their prime, and homely females of whatever age, that were visible in the streets around the porticos of the hotels. I was told they make their appearance thus early in the day, in order to bring about by the celerity of their attack those conquests which the fairer portion of their allies lose by delay, even while possessed of greater forces. A very pretty style of hat seems bent on coming into fashion among the young ladies here; it especially resembles the round caps which we are so accustomed to see on the heads of the Chinese cigar merchants of Broadway. With the exception of these hats, our daughters, wives and aunts look just as they do when they go out for a walk or visit any day in the week.
The principal duty of ladies residing at Saratoga, after dressing themselves, is to visit the springs, sip a moment from a glass of mineral waters, quiz everybody around, make the person who distributes the beverage as much trouble as conveniently possible, and then leave him with no other remuneration than the honor conferred by her presence and her deigning to drink under his roof, — a good reward for a rich prince, but a wretched one for a fellow whose only support is public patronage. The water from the Congress spring is altogether the best; the proper time to drink it is in the evening just before it is salted for the next day. The other springs are not remarkable, except that of High Rock where the water is constantly found at the top of a rock five feet above the ground. Most ladies on their first visit to the springs, go to all of them and drink a glass of each. In the end they become sick, but what the sickness is, nobody knows; a friend suggested that they get tight.
The hotels of Saratoga, being generally spread over much ground, seldom more than two stories high, and fronted with immense pillars, have the classical appearance of Athenian Parthenous. At the same time, however, being painted with a clean white and having green blinds at the windows, they seem to promise a mansion where you can have neatness at least, if not comfort and ease. I am not posted up on the precise number of persons in town; but the number of eggs consumed at a single hotel is nearly two thousand dozen per diem. Imagine the bacon necessary to match such a quantity!
It would have been an amusing thing to hear of all the actions of the country folks round about on the appearance of that meteor last week. One jumped out of bed, crying, “the Lord is coming,” and went outside to see of his house were burnt to ashes. Another on horseback scampered home to tell his woman folks, who directly put the teapot on the fire again and made sundry other preparations towards considering the event with becoming solemnity. A third fell into a ditch; an incipient poet went mad, but his wife has since cured him; in fine, a dozen rustics with mouths agape and eyes stretched wide open stared straight before them without moving a muscle for an hour afterwards.
Well, the idea of this meteor is so bright that I can’t easily get a brighter, so it is best for me to end with it. Farewell and success to you.
Emile Fitzbrun.
Page 11, Entry 9 (Newspaper clipping).
 August 18, 1860
 THE ELIZABETH UNIONIST.
 ELIZABETH,,:::: N. J.
Saturday morning, AUG. 18, 1860.
For the Elizabeth Unionist.
The Lady Clemence.
A Ballad from the French.
By Frances.
In one of the cities of Provence, the troubadours formerly held yearly contests, the prize consisting of three gold flowers, the Marigold, a violet, and a wild rose. The origin of this custom is set forth in the following Romance.
The lady Clemence at Toulouse dwelt,
  Fairest of fair maidens she;
The knight Alphonse burnt with her love; —
  Requited was his constancy.
But rigid parents their love opposed, —
  Thus woes all tender hearts betide; —
Lautree, the father of Clemence,
  Makes her another’s destined bride.
True to her lover, Clemence implores;
  “Let your anger release my sad soul;
My life to my father most surely belongs,
  But my heart is at Alphonse’s control.”
But love than vengeance less could charm;
  Clemence is prisoned in a tower;
Alphonse, like the bird with its mate encag’d
  At the dungeon’s base sighs many an hour.
One night Clemence hears her lover’s voice,
  And weeping to the window flies;
“Alphonse, yield we to the storm; —
One only refuge is;” she cries.
“The king of the French go seek you now,
And bear these flowers to gage my vow.”
“The wild rose the flower I love,
  The violet’s hue is my delight,
The marigold my sadness tells;
  All three will witness to my plight.
Take them, and may they, moistened with
          my tears,
Recall our loves, our griefs, our fears.”
She said; and through the windows bars
  Down to Alphonse the flower she threw;
He to his breast close presses them,
  Then flies, for Lautree is in view.
Now war bursts forth; the English foes
  Dark o’er the walls of Toulouse lower;
Alphonse returns, to finds his friends
  Sinking beneath the invader’s power.
One aged citizen yet resists;
  Alphonse fast to his succor flies: —
Lautree is saved, but his good friend
  Wounded to death beside him lies.
“O cruel father of my friend,
  Who hast refused me for thy son,”
Alphonse dying thus began,
  “My vengeance with thy life is won.”
“To Clemence give thou my farewell,
  And bear to her these bloody flowers; —
Let me but kiss them once again
  In memory of her lonely hours.”
Alphonse expires; his three prized flowers
Lautree to his wretched daughter takes;
She, ere soon she lowly lies in death,
  With trembling hand her will thus makes:
Each year, three golden flowers, she bids,
  In honor of her love and woes,
To the best of troubadours be given, —
  Violet, marigold and wild rose.
Elizabeth, Aug. 11th, 1860.
Pages 12, Entry 10 (Newspaper clipping).
September 1, 1860.
HERALD AND VISITOR
SATURDAY MORNING, Sept. 1. 1860.
PUZZLERS CORNER.
Poetical Enigma
Weary-trudging, plodding onward school-boy,
  Claim my aid, thy task is ended;
Trembling, faltering sinner, turn thee heavenward;
  If I help, thy way is wended.
  Ye troubled and heart-sore, I am your ease;
  Ye perjured and guilty ne’er can I please.
  By high and low, or great or small,
  I’m sought and begged and prized by all.
No prince can hold me, no monarch command,
I am sovereign of all save under God’s hand.
  O fear me, then, fear me, mortals all;
Onward, onward, must ye at my call.
F. C. R.
Pages 12-17, Entry 11 (Newspaper clipping).
THE ELIZABETH UNIONIST.
Saturday morning, Sep. 1, 1860
.
Written for the Elizabeth Unionist,
THE FATE OF RHODIUM.
By F. C. Raymond.
PART I.
Along the Mediterranean not far distant from Carthage, was situated, about the middle of the seventh century, the commonwealth of Opeia. Originally a colony of the Roman emperors, it had been subjected, first to their imperial sway, and afterwards to the barbarians, until now it was nominally a dependent on Constantinople, though in reality an independent state. Its government seem to be a republic; but a republic in which every public office had long been monopolized by the wealthy or nobles. The administration was naturally a one-sided one; the nobles, being exclusive rulers, were ever lenient when themselves were in fault, cruel when the lower classes acted wrongly, and never wavering when their own interest was in question. The consequences—the quarrels and licentiousness that every where ensued—may be easily imagined; in no part of the State, however, were they worse than in its capital, Rhodium. The city, with a harbor opening to it a commerce with all the maritime ports then known, with a position making it an important mart for traffic across the Great Desert, possessed a trade surpassed by few cities in Africa, an opulence equal to that of any. Here resided the president or governor of the republic, together with its principal officers; yet nowhere were license and injustice carried to a greater excess. An instance of this and its results are what we purpose here to relate.
When affairs were in the condition just mentioned, the son of one of the chief officers, while passing through one of the streets of the city, was met and stopped on his way by an aged, poorly attired man. A few words passed between them, the import of which none lingered to learn; on a sudden, however, the young noble growing angry drew his dagger from his side and, without any hesitation, plunged it into the breast of his companion. The old man fell and expired without a groan. Drawing the weapon from the bleeding carcass, the murderer wiped it on the skirt of his robe, and replaced it in its sheath; smiling at his act, he walked leisurely on his road. None stopped him; none set up a cry after him; none seemed to be aware of the deed. Those whose journey led them by the dead body, whether stunned by so glaring an act of wickedness, or inured to such scenes by repetition and conscious at the same time of their inability to resent them, glanced at it in silence and moved on, delaying perhaps through curiosity to ask the assassins name. “Claudius, the Secretary son,” was the ready answer, for the culprit’s name was no secret; but it affected him not
Gradually, as ever happens in similar cases, a crowd of idlers collected around the place. They were presently joined by a somewhat meanly dressed man, in appearance about twenty-eight or thirty years of age, though in reality he wanted five years of it, which misery and dissipation had added to his countenance. He was of medium size, rather stoutly built; his head was large, his forehead high and intelligent, his eyes sunk and restless but possessed of a sharp glance; his mouth was usually tinged with an expression of half scorn, half of unhappiness. He seemed a body having a giant mind once mighty, but now debilitated, yet not destroyed by disease. Less than one half his life had been spent at Rhodium; he came thither when about fifteen years old, at which time he adopted the designation of Ethion.
For some reason the group towards which she adjourned, ceased their talking were conversed only in whispers as he drew near. The cause was soon explained when the new-comer, asking carelessly of an acquaintance, “What victim is here now?” received for an answer: “Alas! it is your turn to be sad today, my poor friend; your father is the latest sacrifice to the nobles.” Hardly had the speaker uttered these last words, before Ethion, elbowing his way through the crowd, arrived at the corpse. He cast one quick glance at the features; in another instant he was on the ground feeling for the pulse which beat no longer, carrying open the bloody tunic and placing first his hand and then his ear over the heart of his murdered parent. The dagger had pierced through that heart, but the son in his frantic grief saw it not. Now resting on his knees he stared vacantly on the body before him; while down from the side of his face which had passed against the breast of the slain, drops of blood trickled on his garments. Those who saw that son, with all the strength and fire and passion of manhood in him, crazed at the sight of the dead old man, ruthless and reckless as they were, felt themselves moved by new feelings. Filled with respect they looked on in silence.
Their very silence aroused Ethion; his dream was over. Springing to his feet, the flush of a new passion lit up his face; filial affection had burned brightly in his breast, but it was now dimmed by the fiercer flame of anger. His eyes glared fearfully around. “What seek you here, my friends?” he said. “Is it so uncommon for a poor man to be killed by a noble that you must run from your house to see it? Have you yourselves lost fathers or brothers and come to pity me? Away with pity! it aids me not. Where is justice? Do you tell me, Go, pray the lord governor to sit him in court and summon a noble for slaying merely a humble man? You might ask justice as well for an injured dog. You get a couple of fair words, perchance, while your oppressor escaped with at most a short sentence of censure. What! put to death a noble for slaying a poor man? You would be laughed at. Would you behold your dearest relatives slaughtered like that poor creature? Then look at my father there and pass on; mutilated as he is, your eyes will behold your nearest and best loved in a week, or a month, or a year. Be ye idiots to suffer such deeds? Will ye not kick against the fate that awaits you all?” “It is of no use,” he muttered to himself, as those who occasionally stopped to listen, and on whom he wished to press revenge, passed on again little caring for his words, “it is of no use to talk to slaves like these; they have grown to the yoke.”
Suddenly the thought occurred to him, that he had been outraged with more impunity by the nobles because he had once been a stranger in the city, and that for the same reason even the lowest classes had less sympathy with him. The thought maddened him. He no longer sought to move the crowd; seizing the corpse, he placed it on his shoulder and, unmindful, unconscious of all around, proceeded to the little cabin which formed his abode. As he went on he revolved many a scheme of vengeance in his mind. His resentment would have at first directed him against Claudius alone; but remembering how the governor all the nobles, by their course of conduct not to punish the assassin, were sharers in his guilt, he became enraged equally at them; and lastly, when he recalled how the sympathy of the people (as he believed) was refused him, he burned for revenge on all.
That night, as he stood under the pure canopy of heaven outside the city walls by the new made grave of his father, his resolution was taken; he was calm and cool now; his mind was determined. With one hand on the breast of his parent, he swore by whatever he held dear and sacred, that he would have vengeance on Rhodium—on Rhodium wherein he had been injured, where there was no justice.
He then returned toward the city and was admitted within the walls by a small postern or night gate. Arriving at his house he found it possessed by a single occupant, a woman, who sat near the hearthstone with her face buried in her hands resting upon her knees. At the sound of Ethion’s entrance, she raised her head, exposing to view her face which, such as would even ordinarily be called handsome, now possessed that peculiar charm which grief alone can impart. She was evidently not more than two and twenty years of age. She was not the wife of Ethion, but she expected to be soon married to him; and on this account her love for him already caused her to lament his father’s loss has her own; she could not but be grieved in his excessive grief.
She was the first to break the silence which ensued after Ethion’s arrival, by asking: “Is he lain in his resting place?” alluding to the murdered.
“He lies now were none can harm him more,” answered the young man. “Nobody marked the place wherein I laid him; not even thou, Callia, knowest of it, and I too shall forget it while he sleeps unavenged.”
“Alas! that the people have no strength to take vengeance for their wrongs. But it seems as if some power must demand retribution, if not here, yet in another existence.”
“Think not so; if here be the wrong, here must be the punishment. But why talk of this now? Time is flying fast. Callia, when tomorrow dawns I shall be on my way from Rhodium; of my return I know nothing except that it cannot be for long, long years to come; perhaps not until my hair be white as snow. O! Callia! Callia!” he continued in a tone of misery as if his heart would break, “it sickens me, it well nigh destroys all life within me, to know that I must give thee up to be another’s bride. I shall come back after many wretched years, and behold my Callia the spouse of another,” he uttered the words slowly, while every syllable seemed to choke him.
But now Callia interrupted him. She had listened in silence to the sad news of Ethion’s sudden departure, gazing on him as if ignorant that he spoke; she was in a dream. But when her love was impeached, she became broad awake; she stood erect, and a single tear glistened in her eye she replied with proud affection:
“Ethion, thou mistakest me. If an eternity were given to me to wait for thee, I should not be found untrue.” She proceeded in a voice of deep pathos. “Yet whither go you that your Callia may not follow? what are they dangers, thy toils that Callia may not share them? A week hence and the ties of marriage would have given me the right always to be with you. O! if thou in any way lovest me, refuse not now to my love that which I should so soon have had by right!” She fell on her knees and clasped her hands in supplication. If Ethion had suffered himself to look in her upturned, imploring eyes, he must’ve been overcome.
“Callia, it cannot be,” answered the wretched man, turning his head aside. The young woman’s head fell down; Ethion raised her and placed her in a chair.
“Yet must you go, and so soon?” she asked after a pause, while a sudden ray of hope passed her countenance.
“Callia,” said the young man, who amid his companion’s silence had regained resolution, “Callia, I have sworn to make this journey; and though thy prayers, thy entreaties may have moved me for a moment they cannot turn me from it. My purpose is a holy one; it admits no delay; it cannot be avoided. When my oath engaged me to it, I had first weighed everything— even thine own love, Callia, as well as mine. Life would not have weighed in the balance with that; the object that I had intended to say it to none; it needs but few words—vengeance for my father’s slaughter.
It was indeed sufficient. The unfortunate Callia knew her lover too well to conceive any further hope of inducing him not to leave the city. She knew that passion was strong within him; she knew when that urged him on his way, opposition was useless. She therefore ceased her entreaties, and proceeded to assist him in preparing to set out for the following dawn.
Early the next morning, a man with a bundle in hand and equipped for long travel, passed through the gates and beyond the walls of Rhodium. That day and the next, that week, that month, his wonted companions missed Ethion from the city; that year and several more passed on and his memory faded from among them.
PART SECOND.
Five and thirty years have passed since the events just narrated, yet scarce a change is perceptible and Opeia. The government, the officers are the same, unless more than ever corrupt; the people bend to the same bondage.
At this time among the merchants that came to Rhodium, was one who brought more than an ordinary quantity of the richest merchandise. What was further remarkable, he was quite desirous of disposing of it in the city, so much so that he suffered most of it to depart at less than its full value, and distributed the greater share of the remainder as presents among the chief officials. The result of his well directed liberality was in part immediate; for the governor, contrary to the law and custom which ordained that merchants of foreign lands should lodge only in the merchants’ quarters, invited the wealthy stranger to a residence in his own palace. The next day, when the merchant signified his intention of remaining permanently in the town, he was directly, with only a faint shadow of formality, admitted to citizenship. Hereupon he proceeded to buy for himself a lordly, magnificent mansion, which he furnished with every luxury that the greatest opulence can command.
The merchant was an old man, with hair so white that he seemed nearly seventy years old. If he was of that age, however, he was free from its usual weaknesses; his frame, once athletic and muscular, still retained most of its former vigor; the weight of time had not bent his back; his head was thrown as proudly erect as that of any man in the fullness of manhood. At the same time, his ever-piercing black eyes that peered out from far beneath a large forehead, gave evidence that the spirit within was not less active than the body. But that look, as it seemed searching through one, made him feel uneasy, and as if it boded him no good; besides, he who could bear return it firmly, might detect in those eyes something of cunning, something of dissatisfaction also there. This glance fully seen, added to a face deeply furrowed with wrinkles, gave an expression of hypocrisy and malice to the whole countenance.
The old man, after becoming a citizen, was known by the name of Evigius. He pretended to be desirous of leading a quiet, secluded, private life, yet he took care to use his endeavors to make himself known by all and popular among every class. His house was continually open to the nobles and the rich, and when they visited him once he knew how to offer the right allurement for their future coming and their friendship henceforward. Occasionally he would introduce some spectacle or games for the amusement of the populace, and they, gratified by an act so pleasing yet so rare, readily extended him their good will. Still he did not affect to be much solicitous about their welfare, for this he knew would excite the contempt and suspicion of the reigning orders.
After residing about eight months in the city, the term of the principal secretary was left vacant by death; the duty of choosing a successor devolved upon the president. The office being lucrative and important had many aspirants after it; but Evigius had only to hint that he desired the place, and it was at once offered him. Six months more passed on, and the administration of the existing president was on the eve of expiring. Strange to say, Evigius came forward as a competitor for the sovereignty of Opeia. He met with a single opponent—Claudius, the son of a former Secretary. Among the nobles, the candidates were on equal terms; among the people, the more recent stranger met more favor. But greater wealth must conquer, above all when virtue enters not into the scale; the ambition of Claudius himself was finally given over for gold. The nobles and people of Opeia, whether it were that the liberality of Evigius subdued them, or that the amazement with which they had been struck at his unexpected position caused them to act mechanically, elected him their president.
The proceedings of the new governor at his inauguration and afterwards, were all in the common order and attracted no special remark. Unseen but steadily he began to make accessions to his authority, until nothing of importance could be transacted in the State without his permission. The military, all the city guards depended on him alone for their movements.
After entering upon his high office, two new features became noticeable in him; one that his beneficence and liberality were at an end; the other, that he keeps under him a servant, a stranger like himself, who, in proportion as he shunned all others, appeared deep in his master’s confidence was frequently engaged in journeys of several days duration. None knew whence this servant came; none guessed the object of his repeated absence.
One day in the fifth month of Evigius’ career as governor, twelve merchants came to the city. This would not of itself have attracted extraordinary attention; but when they were found to have accepted a lodging at the presidential palace, surprise was general, and mutterings of dislike were not uncommon; for the limiting of the merchants to their proper quarters was, for some reason, an ordinance much respected and insisted upon by all classes of the citizens. If any however had serious thoughts of resentment, they kept them silent at least for that day.
It wanted three hours of midnight, when Evigius with one fourth of his new friends made the circuit of the city and viewed the disposition of the night watch. At midnight, a messenger, who had effected his entrance to the town by a private portal brought him tidings at which he rose again with his twelve confederates. Equipped in warriors’ garb with stout swords by their sides, they sallied forth without noise. The city had four great gates, to each of which in turn they advanced, overpowered and slew the guards who on this night had been reduced in number as much as appearance could allow. At each conquered gate three of the conspirators were stationed. When Evigius had ended with the last great portal, he advanced out on the battlements, below which the city lay spread out before him. The rays of the moon, finding their way at intervals through the clouds, showed it lying there in peace, in happy slumber. Could anyone meditate harm to the inmates of those silent rows of houses resting so calmly? Evigius looked outside the city and saw near the wall a dark mass as of a considerable array of men. He turned again to the town. In his hand he held a trumpet; placing it to his mouth, he drew a long blast loud and clear. Far around it resounded until it echoed back from the hills beyond Rhodium. A moment silence again assumed her reign, and then a deafening shout rose up on every side, the gates flew open, and an army of foemen rushed in with unearthly yells upon the unguarded town.
Evigius yet stood where he had rung out the knell of Rhodium. He seemed like an outcast angel of Paradise that loves to make hideous all fair in nature; he seemed like the prince of fiends giving the signal for subordinates to fly to deeds of wickedness worthy of hell alone. Fearful was his laugh as he cried: “Now, Ethion, now comes thy revenge!” He hurried down the turret stairs, and led on a body of the invaders to whom he gave but one command: “Spare none!” O, well they performed their part that dark night! They slew the startled, unresisting inhabitants until their arms grew weary with the work of blood; but ever a voice sounded in their ears, urging them on: “Spare none!”
The hostile troop that filled Rhodium was a band of Saracens from a fort about seventy miles distant. The Moslems had already frequently invaded Africa, but only small bands penetrated as far as Carthage, and none went further; the larger armies preferred to battle in other regions. Beyond Carthage was Rhodium, a city impregnable through its strong and vigilant garrison by any unless a respectable body of forces. Ethion, therefore, whom we have seen abandoning all he loved and leaving the city to devote his energies to gain vengeance, found that his object could be attained only by treason; and that even this would not be successful if he were not first to acquire a considerable and commanding position in the town. Gold alone, he believed, could effect this, and hence to become wealthy was his immediate aim. In pursuit of it he ran many hazards; he became a prisoner in Persia, a captive in Arabia, and thrice a shipwrecked, impoverished merchant; yet still he struggled anew, his thirst for vengeance only increasing. At last he was rich, rich enough for all his evil ends; he returned to Rhodium, gained a post which made his purpose easy, and then opened a correspondence with Zuheir, the leader of a band of Islamites, numbering some nine hundred or thereabouts, quartered in a castle, as we have said, about seventy miles distant. The Moslem was only too glad to accede to the proposal which offered him the booty of Rhodium, and hesitated little at the traitor’s sole stipulation, that “Rhodium was to be razed, its inhabitants to be slain.” The demand was granted, and the Saracens were now for filling their agreement.
The Moslems, however, had still something human left in them, and, unlike old Evigius, became glutted at last with carnage. Zuheir, caring as little for his confederation with the governor of Rhodium, now that his aid was unnecessary, as he himself had cared for his former townsmen, when several thousands had now been sacrificed to vengeance, ordered the mercy of the Koran to be granted the city—only the resisting were to be slain. Evigius in vain opposed it; his rage and protestations were alike powerless. And now the cup which had tasted to him so sweet, began to grow bitter as his first disappointment met him; yet still he rejoiced when he saw Rhodium wrapt in flames and its inhabitants, freeman no longer, moving on well-guarded towards the fortress of the Mohomedan oppressor. He rode backward and forward along that wretched array; and often he taunted the old nobles with their cruelty and avarice, and often cried exultantly: “Ethion, now thy vengeance is won!”
Suddenly, as he thus rode a voice called him: “Ethion! Ethion!” There was something in the words that startled him; though he had pronounced that name himself, he had not heard from another’s mouth for well-nigh forty years. He reined in his horse, and cried gruffly, for much of his courage had departed and not returned: “Who calls on Ethion?”
“It is I; it is they Callia, she whom thou did once so love,” answered the same voice, which he now recognized to be that of an old woman who, overcome by fatigue and exhaustion, half sat, half reclined by the roadside with her back propped up by a large stone.
“Thou liest! it is not Callia whom I left so young and fair,” cried he, yet at the same time getting from his horse and approaching the old woman. He felt his heart sank within him, yet why, he knew not. Had he not given Callia up to vengeance when she was beautiful? had he not cast her image from his memory for countless years. Then what cared he for that shriveled hag, even had she once been his destined bride, even were she the only being yet in existence whom he had once loved with his whole soul? As Evigius approached he noticed on or forehead a large saber-cut of recent date, the blood from which stained her cheek and covered her garments.
“Ethion,” she said slowly, and her words were the words of one whose life was fast ebbing away, “Ethion, I have waited long for thee, and I thank thee that thou comest at last.”
 “Callia is it thou?” asked the old man, when she stopped for breath. “Many a messenger I sent for thee, but they brought me back no word except that thou wert dead.” “
“Ethion,” said the woman again in her passionless, deathlike way, unmindful of his words, “Ethion, hast thou avenged thy father?”
“Look but around thee and behold how full is my vengeance!” replied the traitor fiercely.
“False Ethion!” said the same calm voice, “thou hast sought vengeance for thyself not for my father. Thou wert false to my love, for thou badest me wait while thou didst go to avenge thy father; but is he now avenged? does he rest easier in his grave now? False Ethion! thou hast revenged thyself alone; but,” she added while the shadow of death darkened her face, “thy vengeance is complete.”
Evigius left the lifeless form and mounted his steed. He dashed wildly on, hither and thither, onward, onward, madly, distractedly, unconscious of his movements, so raged the conflict within him. All his acts, his wicked, wretched career stood plain before him; his vengeance which affected not his father, which he had pursued for his own gratification; his deeds of bloodshed; the dying Callia, his last greatest victim. Now the ignominy which must await his old age among men, now the miserable life he must lead until his death, now remorse, and deep, black despair glared hideously in his face. On, on he plunged madly, madly; the strife within, the stings of conscience goaded him forward, that he pressed the rowels in his horse’s side, striving to fly from himself. Suddenly the jaded animal stumbled in its headlong course, and sank on its knees, throwing its master hard on the rough road. Evigius fell, and never rose again. His neck was broken, and he lay there dead.
The next day the survivors of the ruin of Rhodium marched along that same road. The Moslem advance-guard first recognized the traitor’s body; with fierce shouts they rode their horses over it. The crowd behind readily followed that almost forgot their sorrows in trampling on the carcass until it could no more be known as Evigius; no more be known as aught human; no more be known as he who brought destruction on Rhodium.
Page 18, Entry 12 (Newspaper clipping).
No date.
written for the Elizabeth Unionist.
 ST. ROSALINE’S WELL.
A Ballad of Ancient Days.
By Frances.
Robert of Scots rode through the land,
  Gay courtiers swelled his train;
To cities fair and castles gray
  They went o’er mount and plain.
To St. Rosaline’s Well they came at length,
  Where they did straightaway see
Three score of vassals richly decked,
  And at their head a fair lady.
“Who art thou lady,” cried the king,
  “Mid this good train so bright?”
“I was Earl Harold’s promised bride,
Edith of Elton hight.”
“Three years gone by, hard on my frame
  Was laid dread palsy’s hand;
Earl Harold false turned him away
  And sped to Holy Land.
“In my castle’s walls then I shut me up,
  None thought more of me then;
I brooded alone o’er my fortune lost;
  I sighed in my lonely glen.”
“One morn to my bower a minstrel came;
  My bower in the hazel dell;
And he sang to me of sleeping love,
  And he sang of St. Rosaline’s Well.”
“Then by the holy rood I swore,
  Since that minstrel alone was true,
He only might have my once proud hand:
  Should St. Rosaline my form renew.”
“Then hither I came, in the water I bathed,
  And every disease hath fled;
The minstrel has come with heart ever true,
  Him only will I wed.”
“Take back my plight!” outspoke the king,
  “A royal crown shalt thou have.”
Never was it of fair Elton said,
  “Consent to perjury she gave.”
“The priest stands ready, the minstrel too;
  My hand is only his,
Come life or death, tide weal or woe;
  I seal it with my kiss.”
She turned and looked on the minstrel’s
       brow—
  Earl Harold’s form was there.
Shrieking she fell on the hard, cold earth,
  And lifeless lay she there.
Earl Harold took her in his arms
  And long his fate bewailed;
“For thee,” he cried, “Edith! For thee,
  “To Palestine I sailed.”
“My spurs hard-earned, brightly fame
  Were sought for thee alone;
Then must I now return to find
  That thou, my joy, art gone!”
Earl Harold watched by fair Edith’s side
  Full many a trying hour;
And she lived at last, and welcomed back
  Her true night to her bower.
Elizabeth, Sept. 10th, 1860.
Pages 18-19, Entry 13 (Newspaper clipping).
Irish-American
March 3, 1861.
ST. JOHN’S COLLEGE, FORDHAM.
SEMI-ANNUAL DEBATE.
The debating society of St. John’s College some time since made known their intention of appearing in public, and, accordingly, a large crowd was found at Fordham, on Thursday, the 28th ult., eager to enjoy the promised intellectual treat. The number of visitors much exceeded the usual limits; not only was the hall in which the exercises were held, duly filled, but even the adjoining portico was pressed into service, thereby demonstrating either an increase of relatives on the part of the students, or reputation on the part of the College.
Among the foremost of the audience were their two Graces, the Papal Nuncio, late of Mexico, and the Archbishop of New York; the Very Rev. William Starrs, together with a numerous array of the clergy of New York; also Dr. Phillips, of Brooklyn: Mr. Mullally and others.
Before entering upon the debate, the President of the College, the Rev. Auguste Thebaud, stood forward and informed the assembly of the presence of the Nuncio—a proceeding rendered necessary, as his Excellency being a little man, and seated in a high backed chair, was visible only to those upon the stage.
The College Choir then began to discourse sweet music, after which the Chairman, Mr. F. J. Holahan, of Brooklyn, arose and opened the subject—“Is the Centralization of Power the best National Policy?” He passed in rapid review the great empires which the world has looked upon, recalling their rise, their progress, their downfall. He showed that none had been able to grapple with all emergencies, that none could surmount all obstacles; and he asked, where had been the defect in their systems? What policy does their example lead as to declare the best?
Mr. John J. Lynch of New York took the ground that in consolidation alone can they be found strength, that unity alone raises up governments and gives them permanency. History offered him numerous examples to establish his views—Augustus, Constantine, Charlemagne; England, the United States; while against his opponents he brought Italy—a geographical name –the fall of Ireland and other lands. He especially referred to France under Louis XIV, who raised that kingdom to its greatest prosperity and happiness.
The first speaker on the negative, Mr. Numa Samory, of New Orleans, claimed that the great and beneficial changes which had been shown to have taken place in society, were due, not to centralization, but to the Catholic Church, to the invention of gun-powder which gave strength to the weak, and to printing. Examining the reign of Louis XIV, he found that its affects were prejudicial to the rights and liberties of the people, and that it really brought on the first French Revolution. He then recalled the reigns of several monarchs who had centralized in themselves the power of the State. Napoleon, whose ambition depopulated Europe; Henry VIII., who robbed his subjects of their privileges and rights, and threw England into disorder; Cromwell, who flung aside the Constitution—the guarantee of English liberty; and, lastly, the tyrants of the French Convention, who brought such misery on entire France. He concluded by drawing the difference between a centralized power and a free government like our own.
No way daunted, however, by these arguments, the second gentleman of the affirmative, Mr. Auguste Larue, of Three Rivers, Ca., advanced to the support of his comrade. If the reign of Henry VIII was unfortunate, he said, it was not going to centralization, but to the corruptness of his heart. He showed the salutary effects of centralization under Ferdinand and Isabella, how the invader was banished from Spain, how she rose from obscurity. He represented, likewise, the evils arising in this country at the present moment from the want of a centralized power, and the good which Cromwell caused by centralizing the power of the English nation. Finally, he referred to the centralization of power which is to be found in the Catholic Church—the model of all governments.
The last speaker, Mr. J. J. Carberry, of this city, began by explaining how centralization through the passion and caprice which share so largely in it, is ever open to abuse the freedom natural to all men. Centralization, he contended, contains merely a physical unity, not a moral unity, which is so necessary, hence the decline of Austria, of Ireland; while England, which possessed the moral unity, met with success. The United States furnished him with another example of moral unity; for here the people are united, and so strongly that only despotism can break the ties binding them together. Another tendency of centralization, he proved to be the allying of the spiritual, moral and material under its authority—an action which is at once seen to be outrageous. Finally, pointing to the Church, he showed that she was not centralized since great power is given to the bishops independently in their respective dioceses. Mr. Carberry’s arguments were well put, and elicited merited applause.
When this speech had been delivered, the Chairman proceeded to a careful review of the arguments of either side. Governments, he said, are indeed mutable; but it is allowed that free governments tend most to the ends of government, they make men. The tendency, moreover of a centralized government is strong towards despotism. Again, centralization is not to be accepted, because in that case the people do not share in the government, as they should considering the interest which they do, or ought to take in its welfare. Still he would not do away with all centralization, because systems of government depend upon the disposition of the nation, and some may be more benefited by another than a liberal policy. Viewing the question, however, and its general bearing, he felt justified in giving his decision in favor of the negative —“Centralization of power is not the best national policy.”
The debate being ended, the College musicians again poured forth strains of charming music, as, indeed, they had not failed to do during the intervals between the various speeches.
Archbishop Hughes, at the request of the President of the College, at length arose and addressed the debaters. He said that one thing must’ve been noticed by the speakers—viz., that freedom is fully possessed only by the savage in his normal state, remote from all. He likewise considered the debate, both as to the subject and its consideration, fully superior to the highest standard of debates at which he had been present in former years. Nor did he fail to give just praise and merit to the delivery and eloquence of the various speakers; nor in fine did he omit a good word for the music, both vocal and instrumental.
Pages 19-20, Entry 14 (Handwritten) .
REMARKS.
            It will be evident to all intelligent persons that the Editor and publisher of these few sheets, may have intended to say a few words at their close, by way of preface, perhaps, or of peroration. Such an idea may not be ill-founded; but all prefaces and perorations are prefaced or appended to books, etc. in order to explain what is therein contained, thus assisting the reader who might not otherwise find himself able to preserve the Author’s train of argument. Now the Author of this little book thinks that such being the end or aim of prefaces etc. they need have no place here, because there is no necessity for them, and also an impossibility of having them. For, in the first place, we do not expect anybody ever to peruse this book whether or we should or should not aid him by giving him the train of our argument. And, in the second place, we are growing old and forgetful, in so much as we are constrained to acknowledge that we do not ourselves at present see any train or thread of argument in this work, however clearly we saw it in former times when we wrote each piece singly, for we have not since re-read the whole.
Finis
Volume One.
Volume II., of the Works of Edward P. Brownson A.B. will shortly be published, being the Sequel of the present Work.

A Note Book of Valuable and Instructive Matter, by Edward Brownson, Esq., Fordham, February 1860.

Introduction

A Note Book of Valuable and Instructive Matter was written by Edward Patrick Brownson (1843-1864) between February and June of 1860 during his senior year at St. John’s College now Fordham University.
In 1860, St. John’s College was an all-male Jesuit boarding school. The boys who attended St. John’s came from relatively well-off Catholic families. The student body was small and a number of the boys came from South America and the American South. During the American Civil War, St. John’s College graduates joined both Union and Confederate forces. In June 1860, the Jesuits, perhaps from a fear for their land holdings in the slave states, prevented Edward from delivering an anti-slavery graduation speech.

Edward Brownson was a Massachusetts native who had relocated with his parents family to Elizabeth, New Jersey. In 1862, with the patronage of Senator Charles Sumner of Massachusetts, Edward was granted a regular commission as a Captain United States Army with an initial assignment as an officer on the staff of Major General Fremont. Edward subsequently served on the staffs of Generals Casey, Hunt and Hancock. Captain Brownson saw action with Army of the Potomac in every battle from Fredricksburg to theWilderness where he was wounded. Not quite recovered form his wound, he rejoined the Army of the Potomac in the trenches around Petersburg. On August 23, 1864, Edward was mortally wounded at the battle of Ream’s Station while leading a counterattack of reformed elements of the 12th New Jersey after a Confederate breakthrough of the Union position. He was taken from the battlefield to a filed hospital in the rear. He died later that evening in the ambulance that carried him from the field. Captain Brownson is buried in a now unmarked  grave in the Bishop’s Cemetery in East Orange, New Jersey.

The Note Book transcribed here provides an insight into Edward’s classical education and into the formation of his character.

Dennis Kelly
February 2011

A Note Book of Valuable and Instructive Matter
by Edward Brownson, Esq.
Fordham, February 1860.

A Note Book of Valuable and Instructive Matter, by Edward Brownson, Esq., Fordham, February 1860
Remarks on the Study and Talents of one who wishes to become an Orator.
            Eloquence is the power of persuasion. Rhetoric is how to improve by study and imitation the natural gifts of the orator, so as to make him perfect in the use of eloquence. Conviction is to induce the understanding to coincide with one’s views. Persuasion is to gain over the heart and well so that they move at one’s command. Every discourse depends on three things; the speaker, the subject, and the audience. The requisites of the speaker are, great natural genius, culture, a good voice and figure, and a reputation for virtue. The qualities of the orator’s genius are reason, imagination, sensitiveness and memory. Reason is the power which possesses an intuitive perception of truth. Imagination is the faculty able to embody the most abstruse truths. According to Fenelon, the orator should have the subtlety of dialecticious, the science of philosophers, almost the diction is of poets, the voice and gestures of the most consummate actors. The power of memory should take in both words and things.
The three powers of reason, imagination and memory must be well balanced in the orator; for if one of them outweigh the others there is no true oratory. The cultivation of the orator’s talents consists in acquiring a general knowledge of the sciences; of some more, of others less. The orator, says Cicero, needs philosophy in order to become acquainted with the springs of human action. He must also have virtue, which even the ancients acknowledged, since they defined an orator; “virbonus dicendi peritus.”[1] The moral qualifications of the orator should be; a love of truth, of God, and his fellow men and independence, integrity of action, and strength of heart and will. The orator must have knowledge of the laws and institutions of his country, and if possible of all modern governments.
For an oration, the speaker must find what he has to say, must dispose properly the various parts of his subject, and speak in a becoming manner. The speaker needs a good voice, good person, and an agreeable way of presenting himself. In choosing his subject, the orator must look to his own powers and to the end he has in view; and in his discourse everything must be adapted to these two points.
Three kinds of Certainty
Metaphysical certainty is based on the nature of things, and is such that it cannot lead us into error. Physical certainty is founded on the material order of creation, the laws of which will never lead us astray, since they can only change by a miracle. Moral certainty is founded on the known manners and laws of society; we are never deceived by it unless these laws be subverted; but they depending on the nature of intellectual beings suffer no change. The moral certainty of jurors is nothing more than a high degree of probability.
Mortality among Workmen
The average of life in the Sheffield cutlery manufactories is about thirty-two years. The work done here is to round and shape forks, scissors, razors etc. on a stone which is whirled around by steam.  As during the process the workman’s head hangs over the stone, the red-hot sparks of steel fly into his eyes, and the dust of the stone fills his lungs so that they become like a piece of india-rubber.
In the English coal mines, life is shorter than in those of the continent. The collier at his work is like one who gets under a table and works above with a pick. Hence his back becomes rounded, his legs almost die away; it is misery for him to stand up-right add to this the respiration of impure air laden with coal dust, and the momentary danger of being strangled by carbonic acid or torn to pieces by carbureted hydrogen. He ascends to the world above by ladders nearly vertical, or by ropes, or in some cases, by platforms lifted by steam; the first breath of the evening breeze brings rheumatism with all its evils. In other parts of Europe, the governments endeavor to lessen the dangers of the poor collier, but yet the mortality is very considerable.
In general, wherever minute particles of any substance, whether of meal, of cloth, or of common dust, are continually floating about, there is always danger. Tailors who live in close rooms, and compositors, as they are higher up, suffer from carbonic acid. Of the three professions, the parson grows oldest, the lawyer dies first. English review.
page 8-9
Origin, traditions, manners, etc. of the Iroquois
The structure, bones, and muscles of the Indian belong to the Caucasian race. The languages of the various tribes have their connections with each other. From the conformity of the physical features and the many dialects of the Indian tribes, it is probable that America was peopled at a very early day and by a single race. Most of the savages have the tradition that there were once two spirits, one of Good, and the other of Evil; and that after a struggle the former overcame the latter.
The sachems of the five great Iroquois nations, of the Mohawks, Oneidas, Onondagas, Senecas, and Cayugas, met and formed a confederacy about the year 1540: the Tuscaroras joined it about the year 1714. Among these people, totems did not intermarry. Descent was by the female line. Matrons could propose to the warrior to drop his war-club, without an insult to him. The priests yearly supplied sacred fire to all. Witchcraft was sometimes punished with death.
The Mexicans had a tradition of a being both god and man, called Quetzalcoath, who had been their teacher and benefactor. Like him was the Iroquois Hiawatha or Wiseman, who took the shape and manners of the red man, and lived long among the Onondagas who gained his especial favor and blessing; he united the five Nations. The Cherokees speak of a deluge, from which only one family, having been forewarned, was saved in a ship.
The last council of the Six Nations took place in the year 1845. It lasted three days. In the first session, persons were chosen to fill the vacant offices of the two sachems who had lately died; the other two sessions were taken up by the preaching of Jimmy Johnson. After the sessions followed feasts whereat a primeval grace was said, and dances in which every squaw chose her partner. The census of the Iroquois tribe reports 3753 souls.
Wampum was a string of beads either purple or white; the purple were made from common conch; the white from the pillar of the periwinkle. Wampum passed currency among the early Dutch of New York.
Schoolcraft’s Notes on Iroquois.
Page 9
Death and burial of Henry II of England.
When news was brought that prince John, the favorite son of Henry, had joined in the rebellion of Richard, the king fell into a great fit of passion whereof he soon died. In death his features remained stamped with rage. The corpse, before burial, was stripped and plundered of all its grand royal ornaments, and went down to its last abode with no other marks of the mighty monarch than a worthless ring, an old scepter, and a circlet of gold fringe torn from a lady’s dress for a diadem. Richard entered the abbey while the body yet lay un-interred, when, behold! the nose and mouth of the deceased sovereign began to bleed profusely.
Page 9-10
Rosamond Clifford.
The attachment of Henry II to Rosamond Clifford took its rise in his early life; he was married to her about two years before he assumed Eleanor of Aquitaine for his royal consort. He had two sons by her; William Long-Sword and Geoffrey who was afterwards made a bishop. Queen Eleanor having discovered her rival in one of the powers of Woodstock Castle, the two females had an explanation, the result of which was that the fair Rosamond retired to the cloister of Godstow.  Here she ended her days twenty years after.
Page 10
Tooth Sharpening.
Among the African Negroes, there is a certain tribe the people of which are accustomed to sharpen and grind their teeth to a point.
Grecian Marriages.
In the higher Grecian society at the present day, it is the custom for the woman to be given in marriage and to be married without asking her consent. Whilst the ceremony is being performed, the groomsmen, who are generally the god-fathers, hold wreaths or crowns over the couple. The officiating minister afterwards puts these on the head of the twain. A cup of wine (in which, it is said, some bitter ingredient is mingled) is handed to the couple, either of whom drinks half — to signify that they are to share in each other’s joys and ills.
Among the lower classes, the bridegroom must ask the consent of all his future wife’s relations, even to the third cousin. This custom is held to be of such high importance that the violation of it has in some cases cost the offender his life. A man who had made an elopement returned to his native place 30 years after his marriage, and was slain by outraged relations.
Page 11
Armor of the Ancient Grecian Warriors.
The uniform of the ancient Grecian infantry was of bright red; their helmets, breast-plates, cuirasses, greaves and shields were of polished bronze. The shields of the hoplites were about four feet in diameter; a special servant generally had charge of them. The weapons of these troops were short swords and pikes twenty feet in length. Sphicrates introduced the peltastoe, or targeteers, whose armor consisted of a brazen casque and crescent-shaped targets; they also had long swords and spears. Slingers, archers, and javelineers were equipped in brazen helmets and light-shields; this body of the Army soon went out of use.
The Grecian cavalry wore above a buff coat, a heavy bronze cuirass, fitted above with a rim reaching to the nose; over the head was a casque which came down to the ears; the rest of the body to the shins was sheathed in armor; the feet and legs were guarded by heavy boots. The horses had armor on head, sides and back. Altogether the cavalry of the Greeks were attired like the knights of the Middle Ages. They bore two spears, one for hurling, one for close fight, and a curved sword. Machines for casting stones and darts were early in existence.
Superiority of the English language.
The English language is a language which lends itself with ease to the expression of all the wants, thoughts, affections, passions and emotions of the soul, rivaling in pomp and dignity the Spanish, the harmony and sweetness of the Italian, the naturalness and grace of the French, the richness and expressiveness of the German, the philosophical wealth of the Greek, and the majesty of the Latin.
Dr. Brownson.
Page 12
Quotations from Ancient Authors Latin and Greek.
(1) Video meliora, proboque, deteriora sequor.
(Translation: I see better things, and approve, but I follow worse. Ovid, Metamorphoses, VII, 20)
(2) Pares cum paribus facillime congregantur.
(Translation: Equals with equals easily associate)
(3) Conscia mens recti famae mendacia ridet.
(Translation: A clean conscience will win out over false lies, Ovid)
(4) Aut aliquis latet error; equo ne credite Teucri!
(Translation: or some other error lies hidden; do not believe the horse, Trojans)
Quidquid id est, timeo Danaos et dona ferentes (V. AEn. II)
(Translation: Whatever it is, I fear the Greeks even [when they are] bearing gifts)
(5) Parturiunt montes nascetur ridiculus mus. (Hor. Ars Poet.)
(Translation: The mountains are in labor; a ridiculous mouse will be born)
(6) Est modus in rebus, sunt certi denique fines
Quos ultra citraque nequit consistere rectum (Hor.)
(Translation: There is a mean in all things; and, moreover, certain limits on either side of which right cannot be found, Horace—Satires. I. 1. 106)
(7) Mors sola fatetur
(Translation: Death alone proclaims)
Quantula sint hominum corpuscula (Juv. Sat. 10)
(Translation: How small are the puny bodies of humans)
(8) Sero venientibus ossa. (Hor. Ars. Poet.)
(Translation: Bones for those who come late)
(9) Non tali auxilio nec defensoribus istis tempus eget, non si ipse meus nunc afforet Hector. (V. Aen. II.)
 (Translation: Arms are now useless, even though Hector himself were here to use them)
(10) Rarus venit in coeuacula miles. (Juv. Sat. 10.)
(Translation: Seldom is it that a soldier came into the dining halls)
(11) Virtus intaminatis fulget honoribus. (Hor. Od.)
(Translation: Virtue shines with unspotted honors)
(12) Vera salus victis, nullam speare salute. (V. AEn. II.)
(Translation:  True the only hope for the doomed is no hope at all, Virgil, The Aeneid)
(13) Brevis esse laboro, obscurus fio. (Hor. Ars. Poet.)
(Translation: When I labor to be brief, I become obscure, Horace)
(14) Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit. (V. AEn.)
(Translation: Perhaps someday it will help, Vergil, Aeneid, Book I)
(15)  Incidit in Scyllam qui vult vitare Charybdrim.
(Translation: Wanting to avoid Charybdis, he runs into Scylla)
(16) Quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat. 
(Translation: those whom a god wishes to destroy he first drives mad)
(17) Degeneres animos timor arguit.
(Translation:  Fear betrays ignoble souls)
(18) Caret invidia — sobrius aula. (Hor. Od.)
 (Translation: whoever loves the golden mean is serene)
(19) Quidquid erit, superanda omnis fortuna ferendo est.
(Translation: Whatever shall be, every circumstance must be overcome by endurance, Vergil, Aeneid 5.710)
(20) Pallida mors aequo pulsat pede pauperum tabernas regumque turres. (Hor. Od. B. I)
  (Translation: Pale death knocks at the doors of all alike, be it the pauper’s garret or the king’s tower, Horace, Odes, 1.4.13-14)
Page 16.
Destruction of the Libraries of Alexandria.
While Julius Caesar was in Egypt, the royal Alexandria library of four hundred thousand volumes was burnt. It is said there existed an appendix to this of three hundred thousand volumes in the Serapeum which remained unharmed. That such was the case we have no proof; granted that the books existed they could scarce have survived the fires and pillages of the city which happened eight or nine times under the Roman Emperors. Orosius, a Christian historian of the third century, speaks of seeing empty bookshelves in Alexandria; the volumes which belonged there having been destroyed by his countrymen, the Romans.
If, now, there was by some chance a library in Alexandria in the time of Caliph Omar, we find no contemporary writer to speak of its existence or destruction. Two good historians who mention the occurrences of the city, are silent about any libraries there. Towards the close of the eleventh century, an Arabian chronicler says of the town that he thinks Aristotle taught there, and that there stood the library destroyed by command of Omar. Abulfarahgius (unknown) after him takes up the story and says the books were burnt. A third, in the thirteenth century, lays the scene of this literary catastrophe in Persia, and drowns as well as burns the volumes. With all things considered, we may most safely say that Omar burnt no library in Alexandria.
Paulus Orosius (b. circa 375, d. not before 418),[1] less often Paul Orosius in English, was a Christian historian, theologian and student of Augustine of Hippo from Gallaecia.
Page 17-18.
The Last Words of Socrates.
“Crito, we owe a cock to Aesculapius; do ye however not neglect to repay it.” These were the last words of Socrates, as related by Plato. The debt here mentioned is one peculiar to persons who had recovered from some illness. Socrates, in ordering the sacrifice on his own account, probably alluded to the notion maintained by himself and his followers, that this life is given to us to prepare for another — “to teach us to die.” Socrates looked upon life as an imprisonment or malady of the soul, which is not set free or cured until death.
Antiquity and extent of the Slave-trade.
Slavery and the slave-trade are found to have existed wherever the savage hunter began to assume the habits of pastoral or agricultural life. They pervaded every nation of civilized antiquity. The earliest glimpses of Egyptian history present scenes of bondage. The founder of the Jewish nation was a slave-holder and a purchaser of slaves. A Hebrew father might doom his daughter to bondage. Grecian commerce arose from the piracies of Greeks roving in quest of fellow-beings for slaves. In every Grecian republic, slavery was an indispensable element. The name slaves comes from the Slavonic nation which inundated France with slaves. Negroes were sold as slaves in ancient Greece and Rome. The severities of the Roman law to slaves, and the wideness of bondage throughout the Roman state, hastened the downfall of the Roman commonwealth.
The Moors carried on an extensive traffic in Ethiopian slaves, dating from the eleventh century; Europeans were largely engaged in the same work in the fifteenth. The enslavement of American Indians lasted about 200 years. Decrees of Spanish sovereigns authorized the importation of slaves into Hispaniola; the Popes in vain cursed it. Elizabeth was a smuggler and a slave merchant.
Bancroft, Hist. U. S. Vol. X.
Page 18.
Pronunciation of the French u.
La voix u se forme en allongeant les deux lévres en dehors, comme si vous faisiez la moue.
(Translation: The u sound is formed by extending the two lips apart, as if you were making a face.)
L’humeur des Anglais.
(Translation: The mood of the English)
Les peuples du continent out remarqué qion arrive rarément un Anglais deux jours de suite de la même humeur. (Pouqueville.)
(Translation: The peoples of the continent noticed that an Englishman was rarely in the same mood for two days.)
La crainte national.
(Translation: The national fear.)
Chaque peuple a sou objet de crainte particulier. En Espagne, ou craint par-dessus tout, l’enfer; en Italie, la mort; en Angleterre la servitude et la pauvreté; en France, la ridicule et le déshoumeur. (Comte de Ségur) 
(Translation: Every people has a particular fear; in Spain the greatest fear is hell; in Italy, death; servitude and poverty in England, and ridicule and dishonor in France.)
  
Προςμνειν & λατρεμειν.
            The word Προςμνειν is rendered by adore in the sense of honoring or worshiping: λατρεμειν means to give supreme adoration such as is reserved to God alone; the Latin adorare is properly used only in the same sense as  λατρεμειν.
Page 19.
Quotations from the moderns.
We are as near to heaven by sea as by land. (Sir Humph.Gilbert.)
Nature having made no slaves, all men have an equal right to liberty. (Pope Alexand. III.)
Not the Christian religion only, but nature herself, cries out against the state of slavery. (Pope Leo X.)
The man in power has all the virtues of an epitaph; but let him meet with adversity and he is worse than the prodigal son himself. (De Balzac).
In misfortune look upon everything as below you; in virtue and silence, as above you. (St. Martin)
Four things come not back: the spoken word; the sped arrow; the past life, and the neglected opportunity. (Arab Maxim.).
There are deeds which should not pass away,
And names which should not wither.
Page 21.
Enfranchisement of slaves under the Roman law.
Under the ancient Roman law, slaves could be enfranchised only in presence of the praetors or consuls, and with long formalities. Constantine the Great enjoined that a slave might be enfranchised in any Church in presence of the bishops and Christian body, with the sole formality of an attestation signed by the ministers of the Church.
Pages 21-22.
Discussion of Bad Popes.
Stefan VII, often accounted an intruder, offered indignities to the corpse of Formosus[2].
Sergius III, Lando[3], John X, John XI, John XII, have been falsely accused and defamed by Luitprand[4], a partisan of the anti-Pope Leo VIII, because the Emperor Otho[5] had no influence in their election.
Benedict IX, was an intruder and a sorry character whom the Romans frequently ousted.
Pascal II, worn out in prison under Henry V granted the privilege of investitures which he afterwards revoked in council.
Boniface VIII was free from usurpation and ambition.
Clement Vis accused by Villani[6] an enemy of the Pontiffs.
Clement VI was extravagant and pompous.
Boniface IX, is unjustly charged with simony.
Paul III, seemed inconsistent in politics but was not so in reality; nor was he licentious, but he was addicted to nepotism.
Sixtus IV, the same as Paul III in his conduct, though not in the nepotic.
Leo X had a gay court but was not bad. Gregory XIII was bad in early life.
John XV was accused by some, but is vindicated by his epitaph.
Alexander VI licentious before being Pope, not known to be at his election, not so after it, was given sadly to nepotism.
Julius II was bad in early life, but performed; he too was nepotic.
Innocent VIII, Callistus III, Julius III, Innocent X, were given to enriching their relatives.
Page 22.
Pelasgic[7] and Chinese works.
The pelasgic remains consist of monuments of huge stones fitting tightly into other stones. Commodore Perry[8] notices the same kind of structures among the Chinese.
Great men an index of their era.
The history of great men, in whatever age or country they lived, will usually be found to be an exponent or index of the manners and ideas prevalent in their times and among their countrymen. Thus Alexander conquering Persia embodies the favorite design of the Greeks; his vices show the vices of his age. The same is true of Alfred and others.
Elizabeth Patterson.[9]
Mrs. E. Patterson of Baltimore was married by Archbishop Carroll to Jerome Bonaparte[10]. A year after they went to Europe, but Mrs. B. was not received by Napoleon, and so was forced to retire to England. Her grandson is now a captain in the French army.
Pages 23-24.
Napoleonic ideas of Prussia, developed in M. About’s Pamphlet[11].
France has a fellow feeling, a love for Germany.
France, which has aided the Ottoman Empire, the Christians in Turkey, and now aids Italian unity and independence in Greece, is capable of helping Germany.
Germany ever desires unity. Unity raised her to her greatest glory in 1815. Frederick William disappointed the German patriots in 1849; but those patriots still live, as we saw on Schiller’s festival.
France wishes to see Germany united.
Austria or Prussia alone can bring about this union.
Austria will not, for she is despotic, addicted to clerical authority, opposed to progress, and has been made up of nations allied by the marriages of their rulers not by the people’s consent. Austria finds favor only with the squirearchy, for she most of all aids young nobles to rise in military rank. Germany does not love Austria, for it is closed to German manufacturers; nor does she sympathize with Austria — as we beheld in 1859. Austria’s government is the despotism of Divine right; Prussia presents greater freedom of conscience, greater political rights, etc. Germany loves Prussia, and will follow the example of Italy, if Prussia will play the Sardinian deliverer.
Europe is divided between the two principles Divine right and popular right — between hereditary right and the right to reign by universal suffrage. The national assembly offered the crown to the King of Prussia in 1849; but he decided for Divine right and persecuted those who drove out the King of Saxony. Frederick William ought to be the testamentary executor of the Parliament of 1849, just as Napoleon is of the French Revolution.
Napoleon with absolute power strives to raise France to greater prosperity. Frenchmen obey the Emperor because they obey in common; not as Prussians. The French army belongs to the nation; the Prussian army to the king. In France the liberty of the press is postponed, but can be demanded by petition. If Prussian printers be restricted how can they claim their rights?
France is magnanimous. The Prussian police are rascals.
Prussia is exhorted to act as Sardinian has done.
Pages 24-25
Florence and the Medici.
From the beginning of the eleventh century Florence may be considered a republic. It was presided over by ten chief magistrates with a Standard-Bearer chosen every two months at their head. The Medici in the first part of the fifteenth century began to have great influence in the government, in as much as they either enjoyed the highest offices themselves, or had their friends elected to them. Cosmo di Medici, who in 1425 inherited this influence from his father, was an eminent patron of letters and brought about a great revival in literature. Lorenzo, his grandson, himself a poet, offered every aid and inducement to art and artists.
Paper Making.
The rags are first washed. When dry, they are put into a machine constructed with a large roller whose sharp steel teeth tear the rags into such fine pieces that they become like pulp. This part is shaped in moulds with wire crossings for the bottom, and a narrow rim about the sides. It is then put into queries and pressed for the last time.
Fulminating Powders.
Three parts chlorate of potash, and one of sulfur separately pulverized and carefully mixed may be exploded by striking. Six of the chlorate, one of charcoal, and one of sulfur explodes in the same way, but with greater violence.
Printing types, Bells, etc.
Printing types are an alloy of three parts lead and one part antimony. The best bell metal is 80 of copper to 20 of tin. Bronze has about the same composition as bell metal.
Silver for coining contains one 1/13 of copper; gold contains 1/12 copper.
State of the Universe.
Stones grow; plants grow and live; animals grow, feel and live; man grows, feels, lives, and has intelligence.
Boskovich’s Theory of Atoms — Postulates.
Postulates: 1. All matter consists of indivisible and unextended atoms. 2. These atoms are endowed with attractive and repulsive forces, varying both in intensity and direction by change of distance; so that at one distance two atoms attract, at another repel each other.
3. This law of variations is the same in all atoms.
4. At all considerable and sensible distances, these mutual forces are attractive and sensibly proportional to the square of the distances inversely. This is the attraction called gravitation. 5. At very small distances there a many alternations of attraction and repulsion according as the distance of the atoms is changed. Consequently there are many situations within this narrow limit in which two atoms neither attract nor repel each other.
6. The force which is exerted between two atoms when their distance is diminished so as almost to banish, is an insuperable repulsion, such that no force can press the atoms into mathematical contact.
Philosophy of History.
The Philosophy of History is the knowledge of the laws which govern human affairs, deduced from the history of mankind in general and families in particular.
Bosquet calls Revelation the Magna Charta of giving us liberty, and Providence the king ordaining the affairs of the world.
From here below.
— “Since in wailing
There’s naught availing,
But death unfailing
Must strike the blow;
Then for this reason
And for a season
Let us be merry before we go.”
Proof that the Etruscans were Celts.
The writing on four brass plates hung up in Ireland by the Phoenicians, being similar to that on Etruscan tombs, establishes the fact that the Etruscans were Celts.
Meagher.
English in Ireland, at the time of Edward II.
By the English established in Ireland up to the reign of Edward II, is understood an aggregate mass of adventurers from different countries, from England, Wales and Guienne[12];  men, or the descendents of men, of desperate fortunes at home, who had depended on themselves to carve new fortunes abroad. They professed fealty to the English crown; but their fealty was a mere sound. King John chastised them, at the same time that he received the submission of many of the Irish kings
Lingard[13], Life of Edward and John;
 The following memos are found at the end of the book: (editor)
Capt. Edward P. Brownson   D.
To. O. A. Brownson L.L D.
To cash for suit of clothes $40
To cash for trunk $10
To cash for traveling and other expenses $10
To cash for sword and on account for sash $15
Total $75
Elizabeth, June 11, 1862.
Mem.   I expect Mr. Howell to refund at an early day the last of the above items ($15.00), thus transferring to him my debt otherwise to Dr. Brownson
Mem.   The above $40.00 due Dr. Brownson being the cash just rec’d by him as a present from a friend, I do not feel an obligation to pay it before a reasonable convenience of mine. The rest I shall if in my power pay within two months from date.
Capt. Edward Brownson
Aide de Camp to Gen. Fremont
Mem.
In case of any accident fatal to my life, my sister, S. N. Brownson is authorized to examine and dispose of all my effects, as she shall deem just and fit,
June 11, 1862, Edward P. Brownson


[1] “a good man, skilled in speaking.”
[2] Pope c.816-896.
[3] Pope, 913-914.
[4] Bishop and historian, c900-after 970.
[5] Holy Roman Emperor Otto I, 912-973.
[6] Giovanni Villani (c. 1276 or 1280–1348,  was an Italian banker, official, diplomat and chronicler from Florence who wrote the Nuova Cronica (New Chronicles) on the history of Florence.
[7] Prehistoric people mentioned by ancient Greek authors and believed to have lived in, variously, Greece, Asia Minor, and the Aegean Islands.
[8] Matthew C. Perry (1794 – 1858) was the Commodore of the U.S. Navy who compelled the opening of Japan to the West with the Convention of Kanagawa in 1854.
[9] Elizabeth Patterson Bonaparte (Baltimore, Maryland, 6 February 1785 – Baltimore, Maryland, 4 April 1879), known as “Betsy”, was the daughter of a Baltimore, Maryland merchant, and was the first wife of Jérôme Bonaparte, and sister-in-law of Emperor Napoleon I of France.
[10] Jérôme-Napoléon Bonaparte, French Prince, King of Westphalia, 1st Prince of Montfort (15 November 1784 – 24 June 1860) was the youngest brother of Napoleon, who made him king of Westphalia (1807–1813). After 1848, when his nephew Louis Napoleon became President of the French Republic, he served in several official roles.
[11] M. Edmond About, “L’Empereur Napoleon III et la Prusse.”
[12] Aquitaine
[13] Dr. John Lingard (1771 – 1851) was an English Catholic priest, and the author of The History Of England, an 8-volume work published in 1819.
css.php